From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Align the output for interval aggregation mode
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:53:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220105355.GA553812@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200218071614.25736-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 03:16:14PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> There is a slight misalignment in -A -I output.
>
> For example,
>
> perf stat -e cpu/event=cpu-cycles/ -a -A -I 1000
>
> # time CPU counts unit events
> 1.000440863 CPU0 1,068,388 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU1 875,954 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU2 3,072,538 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU3 4,026,870 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU4 5,919,630 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU5 2,714,260 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU6 2,219,240 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000440863 CPU7 1,299,232 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
>
> The value of counts is not aligned with the column "counts" and
> the event name is not aligned with the column "events".
>
> With this patch, the output is,
>
> perf stat -e cpu/event=cpu-cycles/ -a -A -I 1000
>
> # time CPU counts unit events
> 1.000423009 CPU0 997,421 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU1 1,422,042 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU2 484,651 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU3 525,791 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU4 1,370,100 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU5 442,072 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU6 205,643 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
> 1.000423009 CPU7 1,302,250 cpu/event=cpu-cycles/
>
> Now output is aligned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
thanks,
jirka
> ---
> tools/perf/util/stat-display.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> index bc31fccc0057..95b29c9cba36 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> @@ -114,11 +114,11 @@ static void aggr_printout(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> fprintf(config->output, "S%d-D%d-C%*d%s",
> cpu_map__id_to_socket(id),
> cpu_map__id_to_die(id),
> - config->csv_output ? 0 : -5,
> + config->csv_output ? 0 : -3,
> cpu_map__id_to_cpu(id), config->csv_sep);
> } else {
> - fprintf(config->output, "CPU%*d%s ",
> - config->csv_output ? 0 : -5,
> + fprintf(config->output, "CPU%*d%s",
> + config->csv_output ? 0 : -7,
> evsel__cpus(evsel)->map[id],
> config->csv_sep);
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 7:16 [PATCH] perf stat: Align the output for interval aggregation mode Jin Yao
2020-02-20 10:53 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-03-18 19:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-04 8:42 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Jin Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220105355.GA553812@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.