All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
	"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] pull: refactor fast-forward check
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:18:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fd4df3f51f40_bc1eb20810@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5z58n88i.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

Hello,

Just to state that I'm not ignoring this feedback.

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > It's much cleaner this way.
> 
> It is obvious that a focused single purpose helper with less
> indentation is easier to follow both at the calling site and the
> implementation itself.

Yes, but the reader hasn't reached that point of the story yet.

> "It's much cleaner" is not something you need to say.

From the top of my head I can think of a few other reasons to refactor
code: a) it's more logical, b) it's less code, c) it's helps further
changes.

It's not necessary to say, but that's what I want to say; this reason,
and no other reason, is the main reason for this patch's existence.

> > Also, we would like to be able to make this check before the decision to
> > rebase is made.
> 
> ... in a future step.

Right.

It's not necessarily the case (could be an indeterminate future), but it
is the case in this patch series.

> That is something we want to say upfront, not "Also".

Not from my point of view. Even if it didn't help in future steps,
cleaning up code is generally desirable.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-12 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 10:05 [PATCH v5 0/3] pull: stop warning on every pull Felipe Contreras
2020-12-10 10:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] pull: refactor fast-forward check Felipe Contreras
2020-12-11  6:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-12 15:18     ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2020-12-10 10:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] pull: move default warning Felipe Contreras
2020-12-11  6:54   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-11  7:55     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-12  0:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-12  1:05         ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-13 20:58           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-14 11:02             ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-12 16:42       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-10 10:05 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] pull: display default warning only when non-ff Felipe Contreras
2020-12-11  7:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-11 12:48     ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-11 23:56       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-12  1:01         ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-12  2:11         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-12 16:01           ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-14 21:04             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-14 21:40               ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-11  7:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] pull: stop warning on every pull Junio C Hamano
2020-12-11 13:28   ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-12  2:50     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-12 16:36       ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-14  0:57         ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-12 16:52 Felipe Contreras
2020-12-12 16:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] pull: refactor fast-forward check Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fd4df3f51f40_bc1eb20810@natae.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=vondruch@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.