All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>,
	andrii_anisov@epam.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/21] xen/arm: Allow vpl011 to be used by DomU
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:00:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <026ce1fc-5c4e-3691-a150-347b3a072d2c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1807261552090.20701@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>

Hi Stefano,

On 27/07/18 01:10, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 07/07/18 00:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> +    VPL011_UNLOCK(d, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void vpl011_write_data_noring(struct domain *d, uint8_t data)
>>> +{
>>> +    unsigned long flags;
>>> +    struct vpl011 *vpl011 = &d->arch.vpl011;
>>> +
>>> +    VPL011_LOCK(d, flags);
>>> +
>>> +    printk("%c", data);
>>> +    if (data == '\n')
>>> +        printk("DOM%u: ", d->domain_id);
>>
>> You want to buffer the characters here and only print on newline or when the
>> buffer is full. Otherwise characters will get mangled with the Xen console
>> output or other domains output.
> 
> I did the implementation, but then when I type characters at the domain
> prompt, I don't see them anymore one by one. Only after I press
> "enter". That makes the domain console not very usable. Should we keep
> it as?

I haven't thought about that case. However, if you don't implement the 
buffer solution, you will get all the domain consoles mangled during 
boot. This is not really nice for debugging. A potential solution is to 
buffer for all the domains but the one that is reading characters.

>>> +
>>> +    vpl011->uartris |= TXI;
>>> +    vpl011->uartfr &= ~TXFE;
>>> +    vpl011_update_interrupt_status(d);
>>> +
>>> +    VPL011_UNLOCK(d, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static uint8_t vpl011_read_data_inring(struct domain *d)
>>> +{
>>
>> I think you can avoid the duplication here by using a macro.
> 
> I prefer to avoid MACROS for things like this. I would rather reuse the
> existing function for both cases like in v1. Would you be OK to go back
> to that?

I would rather keep the duplication over going back to v1.

I may have another way to keep the code common, but let's look at that 
in a latter patch. For now, I will deal with the duplication.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-06 23:11 [PATCH v2 00/21] dom0less step1: boot multiple domains from device tree Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] xen/arm: rename get_11_allocation_size to get_allocation_size Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 12:55   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-11 20:09     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] xen/arm: make allocate_memory work for non 1:1 mapped guests Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 13:43   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-09 23:02     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-10 17:57       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-11 21:42         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 13:58   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-09 23:10     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-23 18:01   ` Andrii Anisov
2018-07-23 18:32     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-24 12:09       ` Andrii Anisov
2018-07-06 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] xen: allow console_io hypercalls from certain DomUs Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 13:48   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-17 20:05     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-17 20:26       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-18 17:10         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-19  9:19           ` Julien Grall
2018-08-17 19:41             ` Daniel De Graaf
2018-07-06 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] xen/arm: move a few DT related defines to public/device_tree_defs.h Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 13:59   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] xen/arm: extend device tree based multiboot protocol Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 14:07   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-13 22:41     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-16 14:14       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-16 22:02         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] xen/arm: do not pass dt_host to make_memory_node and make_hypervisor_node Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 14:11   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-09 21:51     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-10 17:28       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-11 20:33         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] xen/arm: rename acpi_make_chosen_node to make_chosen_node Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 14:12   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] xen/arm: increase MAX_MODULES Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] xen/arm: move cmdline out of boot_modules Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-09 14:53   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-10  0:00     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-10 21:11       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-13  0:04         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] xen/arm: don't add duplicate boot modules Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] xen/arm: probe domU kernels and initrds Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] xen/arm: refactor construct_dom0 Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] xen/arm: introduce construct_domU Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] xen/arm: generate a simple device tree for domUs Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] xen/arm: generate vpl011 node on device tree for domU Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-12 18:14   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-13 21:24     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] xen/arm: introduce a union in vpl011 Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] xen/arm: refactor vpl011_data_avail Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-24  9:58   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-27 22:37     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] xen/arm: Allow vpl011 to be used by DomU Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-24 11:00   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-27  0:10     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-27 11:00       ` Julien Grall [this message]
2018-07-27 21:42         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] xen/arm: introduce create_domUs Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-16 16:10   ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-16 21:44     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-24 13:53   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-28  2:42     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-30 10:26       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-30 18:15         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] xen: support console_switching between Dom0 and DomUs on ARM Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-16 16:19   ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-16 21:55     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-17  6:37       ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-17 16:43         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-18  6:41           ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-18 16:51             ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-17  8:40       ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-17 16:33         ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-17 20:29   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-18  7:12     ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-18 16:59       ` Julien Grall
2018-07-19  6:10         ` Jan Beulich
2018-07-19 17:18           ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-18 17:01       ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-18 20:37         ` George Dunlap
2018-07-17 20:34   ` Julien Grall
2018-07-18 17:31     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-06 23:12 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] xen/arm: split domain_build.c Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-12 18:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] dom0less step1: boot multiple domains from device tree Julien Grall
2018-07-13 20:54   ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-18 16:48     ` Julien Grall
2018-07-18 17:48       ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-23 17:13         ` Julien Grall
2018-07-23 17:52           ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-07-23 17:14 ` Andrii Anisov
2018-07-23 17:55   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=026ce1fc-5c4e-3691-a150-347b3a072d2c@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=andrii_anisov@epam.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanos@xilinx.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.