From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Vihas Mak <makvihas@gmail.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: seanjc@google.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com,
joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix cocci warnings
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04b7e240-8e1d-1402-3cef-e65469bd9317@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o86leo34.fsf@redhat.com>
On 11/15/21 10:59, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> One minor remark: 'kvm_set_pte_rmapp()' handler is passed to
> 'kvm_handle_gfn_range()' which does
>
> bool ret = false;
>
> for_each_slot_rmap_range(...)
> ret |= handler(...);
>
> and I find '|=' to not be very natural with booleans. I'm not sure it's
> worth changing though.
Changing that would be "harder" than it seems because "ret = ret ||
handler(...)" is wrong, and "|" is even more unnatural than "|=" (so
much that clang warns about it).
In fact I wonder if "|=" with a bool might end up warning with clang,
which we should check before applying this patch. It doesn't seem to be
in the original commit[1], but better safe than sorry: Nick, does clang
intend to warn also about "ret |= fn()" and "ret &= fn()"? Technically,
it is a bitwise operation with side-effects in the RHS.
Paolo
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f59cc9542bfb461
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-14 16:43 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix cocci warnings Vihas Mak
2021-11-15 9:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-15 11:33 ` Vihas Mak
2021-11-16 9:50 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-11-16 18:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-15 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-15 17:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-15 20:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-16 7:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04b7e240-8e1d-1402-3cef-e65469bd9317@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=makvihas@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.