All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
	Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
	Francisco Jerez <francisco.jerez.plata@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:09:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13207937.r2GEYrEf4f@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1709487.Bxjb1zNRZM@kreacher>

Hi All,

On Monday, July 27, 2020 5:13:40 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 7:37:04 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > This really is a v2 of this patch:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11663271/
> > 
> > with an extra preceding cleanup patch to avoid making unrelated changes in the
> > [2/2].
> 
> Almost the same as before, but the first patch has been reworked to handle
> errors in store_energy_performance_preference() correctly and rebased on top
> of the current linux-pm.git branch.
> 
> No functional changes otherwise.

One more update of the second patch.

Namely, I realized that the hwp_dynamic_boost sysfs switch was present in the
passive mode after the v3 (and the previous versions) of that patch which isn't
correct, so this modifies it to avoid exposing hwp_dynamic_boost in the passive
mode.

The first patch is the same as in the v2.

Thanks!




  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-28 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16 17:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-16 17:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange the storing of newv EPP values Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-16 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-31 11:59   ` [cpufreq] 48fc4efcdd: WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency_detected kernel test robot
2020-07-31 23:25     ` Francisco Jerez
2020-08-03 17:19       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-03 17:19         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-27 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-27 15:15   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange the storing of new EPP values Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-27 15:17   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-28 15:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-07-28 15:11     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange the storing of new EPP values Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-30  1:31       ` Francisco Jerez
2020-07-28 15:13     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-01 23:21       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-08-02 14:14         ` Doug Smythies
2020-08-02 19:20           ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-08-03 17:17       ` [PATCH v5] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-01 16:39     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-08-02 14:00       ` Doug Smythies
2020-08-02 18:39         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-08-03  0:26           ` Doug Smythies
2020-08-03 17:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-04 15:10   ` [PATCH v6] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-04 17:04     ` Doug Smythies
2020-08-05  9:34       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-05 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-08-05 16:28           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-05 16:55   ` [PATCH v7] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-06  5:55     ` Doug Smythies
2020-08-06 11:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-06 12:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-10  0:44       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-08-11  0:51       ` Francisco Jerez
2020-08-11 15:33         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-17 21:06       ` Doug Smythies
2020-09-07  0:16         ` Doug Smythies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13207937.r2GEYrEf4f@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=francisco.jerez.plata@intel.com \
    --cc=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.