From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759770Ab2C2QsR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:48:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18919 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759593Ab2C2Qpw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:45:52 -0400 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Edac Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [PATCH 06/13] edac: Initialize the dimm label with the known information Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:45:39 -0300 Message-Id: <1333039546-5590-7-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1333039546-5590-1-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com> References: <1333039546-5590-1-git-send-email-mchehab@redhat.com> To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While userspace doesn't fill the dimm labels, add there the dimm location, as described by the used memory model. This could eventually match what is described at the dmidecode, making easier for people to identify the memory. For example, on an Intel motherboard, the memory is described as: Memory Device Array Handle: 0x0029 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 2048 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: 1 Locator: A1_DIMM0 Bank Locator: A1_Node0_Channel0_Dimm0 Type: Type Detail: Synchronous Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: A1_Manufacturer0 Serial Number: A1_SerNum0 Asset Tag: A1_AssetTagNum0 Part Number: A1_PartNum0 After this patch, the memory label will be filled with: /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/dimm0/dimm_label:mc#0channel#0slot#0 With somewhat matches what it is at the Bank Locator DMI information. So, it is easier to associate the dimm labels, of course assuming that the DMI has the Bank Locator filled, and the BIOS doesn't have any bugs. Yet, even without it, several motherboards are provided with enough info to map from channel/slot (or branch/channel/slot) into the DIMM label. So, letting the EDAC core fill it, by default is a good thing. It should noticed that, as the label filling happens at the edac_mc_alloc(), drivers can override it to better describe the memories (and some actually do it). Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c index 2793fcb..138437c 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c @@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned edac_index, struct rank_info *chi, *chp, *chan; struct dimm_info *dimm; u32 *ce_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS], *ue_per_layer[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS]; - void *pvt; + void *pvt, *p; unsigned size, tot_dimms, count, pos[EDAC_MAX_LAYERS]; unsigned tot_csrows, tot_cschannels; - int i, j; + int i, j, n, len; int err; int row, chn; @@ -311,9 +311,22 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned edac_index, i, (dimm - mci->dimms), pos[0], pos[1], pos[2], row, chn); - /* Copy DIMM location */ - for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++) + /* + * Copy DIMM location and initialize the memory location + */ + len = sizeof(dimm->label); + p = dimm->label; + n = snprintf(p, len, "mc#%u", edac_index); + p += n; + len -= n; + for (j = 0; j < n_layers; j++) { + n = snprintf(p, len, "%s#%u", + edac_layer_name[layers[j].type], + pos[j]); + p += n; + len -= n; dimm->location[j] = pos[j]; + } /* Link it to the csrows old API data */ chan->dimm = dimm; -- 1.7.8