All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Myron Stowe <mstowe@redhat.com>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: x86: runtime waring in pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:54:54 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335905694.2386.138.camel@zim.stowe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1204280819270.14507@math.ut.ee>

On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 08:36 +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > So, somehow, your system hit the assertion (WARN_ON) in
> > pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup().  From the dmesg log you provided I can see
> > why pcibios_save_fw_addr() was called - there is a resource collision
> > with the video device's GART - but what I don't understand is how the
> > assertion is being triggered.
> > 
> > There are only two callers of pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup()
> > (see ./arch/x86/pci/i386.c:: pcibios_save_fw_addr(), and
> > pcibios_retrieve_fw_addr()) and both of those are acquiring the lock
> > before making the call - so triggering the assertion just doesn't seem
> > possible but obviously it is getting triggered.
> > 
> > I don't have any ideas currently but do have some questions that
> > hopefully will start to enlighten us.
> > 
> >         Does your system encounter this consistently upon every boot or
> >         is it hit intermittently?
> 
> Every time.
> 
> >         Do you know of any kernel versions that do not encounter it?
> 
> Checked my logs, no kernel up to 3.3.0 included gave it, next tested 
> kernel was 3.4.0-rc2 and that had the warning and every kernel since has 
> had it.
> 
> >         Are you running a para-virtualized kernel?
> 
> No.

Thanks for the quick response Meelis (unlike myself; I've been consumed
with a hard deadline task recently - sorry).

I got together with Bjorn and after showing him the paths, and locking,
he also did not see how we could be hitting the WARN_ON.  I would like
to take advantage of your system since it encounters this consistently
but really have no idea how to progress currently.  I'll query a couple
of my colleagues for suggestions.  In the meantime, if anyone else -
Jesse - has any ideas, please speak up.

As for you noticing this after 3.3.0 that makes sense as the WARN_ON was
added with 3.3.0.

Myron





  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-01 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-12 19:41 x86: runtime waring in pcibios_fwaddrmap_lookup Meelis Roos
2012-04-13  1:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-27 20:14   ` Myron Stowe
2012-04-28  5:36     ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-01 20:54       ` Myron Stowe [this message]
2012-05-07 22:44         ` Myron Stowe
2012-05-13 15:15           ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-14 20:21             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-14 20:53               ` Meelis Roos
2012-05-15 23:02                 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335905694.2386.138.camel@zim.stowe \
    --to=mstowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.