From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932956Ab2GKQ2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:28:14 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:25389 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932738Ab2GKQ2M (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:28:12 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=AtpsLZBP c=1 sm=0 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=XQbtiDEiEegA:10 a=t8C3CB5ssRAA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=XyIT4aO6M0Qy3YRtcYoA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29 Message-ID: <1342024090.14828.45.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ftrace/x86: Add separate function to save regs From: Steven Rostedt To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , "H. Peter Anvin" , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:28:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1342023754.14828.43.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <20120702200322.573660631@goodmis.org> <20120702201821.510485400@goodmis.org> <4FF2AD59.6080006@hitachi.com> <1342023754.14828.43.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:22 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 17:29 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > > > > + /* Restore flags */ > > > + pushq EFLAGS(%rsp) > > > + popfq > > > + > > > + MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME > > > > Here, if MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME has skip too, I think you don't > > need to restore flags before restoring other registers, like > > below; > > > > MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME 8 > > popfq > > > > And also, this will prevent to modify flags before return by > > addq in MCOUNT_RESTORE_FRAME. > > Ah, because the addq will modify flags :-/ > > Grumble, I guess I should implement this, even though it will make it a > little more complex. I thought it was better to restore flags > explicitly, but that's not the case. > I know why I did this. Do you want kprobes to be able to modify flags? If so, then I need to add, before the restore: movq EFLAGS(%rsp), %rax movq %rax, SS(%rsp) -- Steve