On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 7:20:49 AM CEST Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:08:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday, October 10, 2016 3:23:22 PM CEST Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for reporting it. It looks like 'mtune=atom' sometimes makes a > > > slight change to one of the stack frame setup instructions. Instead of: > > > > > > move rsp, rbp > > > > > > It sometimes does: > > > > > > lea (%rsp),%rbp > > > > > > They're two different instructions, but they have the same result. It's > > > an easy fix for objtool. I'll post a patch soon. > > > > > > > > > > Ah, good to hear. I've replaced my patch with yours in my randconfig > > tests now and will let you know if there are any other warnings on > > atom. I've done a few thousand x86 randconfig builds now and done private > > patches for all warnings I got (I previously had fixes only for the arm > > warnings). I found objtool warnings for a few files in some configurations > > that do not involve -mtune=atom, maybe you can also look at what > > is going on there as I have no idea for how to address them: > > > > drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.o: warning: objtool: fnic_log_q_error() falls through to next function fnic_handle_link_event() > > drivers/scsi/snic/snic_res.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section > > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_comp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_completer()+0x2f3: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer > > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_responder()+0x10f: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer > > kernel/locking/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: down_write_killable()+0x16: call without frame pointer save/setup > > > > I can provide additional information for reproducing them if it's > > not immediately obvious what the problems are. > > I'm really surprised the 0-day bot didn't find these. I was under the > impression that it continuously did a bunch of randconfigs. > > Anyway, if you could send the configs for the warnings, that would be > very helpful. > > I also happen to be working on a significant rewrite of objtool and > these configs will come in handy for making a regression suite. I've attached the three .config files here, but due to the size I don't know if they make it to the list or your inbox. Let me know if you get them, and if you are able to reproduce the problem. The compiler version I used is gcc-6 (Ubuntu 6.2.0-3ubuntu11~16.04) 6.2.0 20160901, and this is on top of linux-next plus a few other patches. Arnd