Hi Shawn,

On 11.09.2018 03:53, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:19:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:00:23AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>>> I was expecting to get a pull request with the precursor patches in it -
>>>> the regulator driver seems to get a moderate amount of development so
>>>> there's a reasonable risk of conflicts.
>>
>>> What about you create a stable topic branch for regulator patches and I
>>> pull it into IMX tree?
>>
>> Sure, I can send a pull request back but the first two patches in the
>> series are ARM ones - are you OK with me just applying them and sending
>> them in the pull request or do you want to apply them first?
> 
> I just took another look at the series.  It seems that there is no
> build-time dependency between regulator and platform patches.  So I
> think we can handle the series like:
> 
>  - You apply patch #3, #4 and #5 on regulator tree;
>  - I apply the reset on IMX tree.
> 
> There shouldn't be any build or run time regression on either tree, and
> the feature that the series adds will be available when both trees get
> merged together on -next or Linus tree.
> 
> @Oleksij Is my understanding above correct?

Yes.