From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77A822C00C3 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:11:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <1377727813.3819.156.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/31] powerpc/fsl-pci: improve clock API use From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Gerhard Sittig Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:10:13 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20130828155944.GA30987@book.gsilab.sittig.org> References: <1374495298-22019-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1375821851-31609-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1375821851-31609-10-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <20130828120827.GB26379@book.gsilab.sittig.org> <20130828155944.GA30987@book.gsilab.sittig.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Mackerras , Anatolij Gustschin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 17:59 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 14:08 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > > > > [ re-created the Cc: list, this is about the PCI clock exclusively ] > > I just noticed by coincidence that the message which I received > back from the linuxppc-dev ML appeared to have dropped Benjamin > Herrenschmidt and Kumar Gala from the Cc: list -- while they do > appear in the header of the message that I have sent and I can't > see what might have caused the loss of information. :-O Don't bother with me. I haven't had the bandwidth to look at that at all. I'll leave Anatolij the responsibility here :-) Cheers, Ben. > Do you want me to re-send the message for the benefit of > potential followups, or is it OK that you receive the message via > the list but potentially without the Cc: attribute? > > The message was mostly "for your information" and contained a > status update, while no action is required or problems need to > get resolved. > > > virtually yours > Gerhard Sittig From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:10:13 +1000 Subject: [PATCH v4 09/31] powerpc/fsl-pci: improve clock API use In-Reply-To: <20130828155944.GA30987@book.gsilab.sittig.org> References: <1374495298-22019-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1375821851-31609-1-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <1375821851-31609-10-git-send-email-gsi@denx.de> <20130828120827.GB26379@book.gsilab.sittig.org> <20130828155944.GA30987@book.gsilab.sittig.org> Message-ID: <1377727813.3819.156.camel@pasglop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 17:59 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 14:08 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > > > > [ re-created the Cc: list, this is about the PCI clock exclusively ] > > I just noticed by coincidence that the message which I received > back from the linuxppc-dev ML appeared to have dropped Benjamin > Herrenschmidt and Kumar Gala from the Cc: list -- while they do > appear in the header of the message that I have sent and I can't > see what might have caused the loss of information. :-O Don't bother with me. I haven't had the bandwidth to look at that at all. I'll leave Anatolij the responsibility here :-) Cheers, Ben. > Do you want me to re-send the message for the benefit of > potential followups, or is it OK that you receive the message via > the list but potentially without the Cc: attribute? > > The message was mostly "for your information" and contained a > status update, while no action is required or problems need to > get resolved. > > > virtually yours > Gerhard Sittig