All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] sched: completion: lock-free checking of the blocking case
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:41:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422013307-13200-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.at> (raw)

The "thread would block" case can be checked without grabbing the lock

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
---

If the check does not return early then grab the lock and recheck.
A memory barrier is not needed as complete() and complete_all() imply
a barrier.

The ACCESS_ONCE is needed for calls in a loop that, if inlined, could
optimize out the re-fetching of x->done.

 kernel/sched/completion.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/completion.c b/kernel/sched/completion.c
index 7c5cd70..5f7cf31 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/completion.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c
@@ -268,6 +268,15 @@ bool try_wait_for_completion(struct completion *x)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * Since x->done will need to be locked only
+	 * in the non-blocking case, we check x->done
+	 * first without taking the lock so we can
+	 * return early in the blocking case.
+	 */
+	if (!ACCESS_ONCE(x->done))
+		return 0;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
 	if (!x->done)
 		ret = 0;
-- 
1.7.10.4


             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-23 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-23 11:41 Nicholas Mc Guire [this message]
2015-02-04 14:38 ` [tip:locking/core] sched/completion: Add lock-free checking of the blocking case tip-bot for Nicholas Mc Guire

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1422013307-13200-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.at \
    --to=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.