All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:26:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423063563.2090.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150204172925.728016bf@canb.auug.org.au>

On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:29 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'sdev_prefix_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:119:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
>   ret = dev_printk(level, &sdev->sdev_gendev, "%s", logbuf);
>       ^
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'scmd_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:146:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
>   ret = dev_printk(level, &scmd->device->sdev_gendev, "%s", logbuf);
>       ^
> 
> Caused by commit ded85c193a39 ("scsi: Implement per-cpu logging
> buffer") interacting with commit d1f1052c5204 ("device: Change
> dev_<level> logging functions to return void") from the driver-core
> tree.
> 
> I added the following merge resolution patch.  Someone will have to
> remember to tell Linus.  Also, the void return may be able to be
> propagated further up the chain since these two new affected functions
> now always return 0.

Hannes posted a more correct fix for it today to the scsi list.
However, sorting this out isn't just about the short term fix:  We can't
afford the bisection failure of SCSI not building over a wide range of
commits, so our tree will need to be pulled ahead of the driver-core
tree.

I've got to say, while it's great that linux-next spotted this ahead of
time (saves us all a massive beating from Linus, thanks Stephen) it's
unfortunate to have this type of thing turn up on the edge of a merge
window, especially caused by a trivial commit which perhaps shouldn't
have gone in so late.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-04  6:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-04  6:47 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-04 15:26 ` James Bottomley [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-20  0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28  8:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-06  5:04 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13  0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13 16:18   ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-23  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-23  0:56 ` James Bottomley
     [not found]   ` <20161224123853.08284e8a@canb.auug.org.au>
2016-12-24 10:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-12-24 10:44       ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-24 11:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-24 16:48       ` James Bottomley
2015-11-13  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-13  8:32 ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-06-02  8:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-02 15:02 ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10  6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-10  6:27 ` Anish Bhatt
2014-11-10 13:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 15:21     ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 15:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 15:50         ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 16:01           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-04  4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-04  7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-05  4:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03  2:52 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03  7:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-03 18:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26  8:34 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-26  8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26  9:57   ` James Bottomley
2014-09-26 12:43     ` Brian King
2013-01-12  2:23 wenxiong
2013-01-11  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-11  7:34 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 15:27   ` Brian King
2013-01-11 15:37     ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 16:05       ` Greg KH
2013-01-11 17:35         ` Brian King
2013-01-11 18:04           ` James Bottomley
2012-07-20  0:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-20  8:50 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-26  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-26  7:57 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-26 14:07   ` Greg KH
2012-03-27  7:29     ` James Bottomley
2012-03-27 22:17     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-27 22:22       ` Greg KH
2012-03-27 22:35         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-27 22:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-28 23:54             ` Greg KH
2012-03-29 19:38             ` Greg KH
2012-03-28 23:52           ` Greg KH
2012-03-29  7:32             ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-29  8:25               ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-29  8:35                 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-29  9:03                 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-29 16:15                   ` Greg KH
2012-03-23  2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-23  4:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-23  8:14   ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23  8:53     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-23  9:01       ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23 15:22         ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-23 10:26   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-23 15:30     ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-23  8:20 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23  9:24   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-15  1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-15  6:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-29  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29  7:17 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-29  8:07   ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-05-27  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-27 13:47 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-26  0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-26 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-10  1:33 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-10 22:16 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-10 23:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-16  0:38   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1423063563.2090.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.