From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934005AbbELV7V (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:36394 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933327AbbELV7N (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:13 -0400 From: tyler.baker@linaro.org To: Shuah Khan Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Kevin Hilman , John Stultz , Darren Hart , Michael Ellerman , David Herrmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Tyler Baker Subject: [PATCH 0/2] selftests: installation fixes Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:59:05 -0700 Message-Id: <1431467947-29847-1-git-send-email-tyler.baker@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tyler Baker This is a follow up series to address a simple lib.mk installation issue[1]. Essentially, install is being called without checking that there exists test artifacts to install, which in turn causes 'make install' to fail. By creating a simple loop we can avoid if/elif/else blocks to determine if install actually needs to be called. I've tested this series by building and deploying tests on x86[2], arm64[3], and arm[4] platforms. This series is based on next-20150512. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/20/746 [2] http://lava.kernelci.org/scheduler/job/83448/log_file#L_40 [3] http://lava.kernelci.org/scheduler/job/83665/log_file#L_44 [4] http://lava.kernelci.org/scheduler/job/83442/log_file#L_65 Tyler Baker (2): selftests/lib.mk: fix INSTALL_RULE selftests/breakpoints: only set TEST_PROGS when built tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile | 3 +-- tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tyler.baker@linaro.org (tyler.baker at linaro.org) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:59:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] selftests: installation fixes Message-ID: <1431467947-29847-1-git-send-email-tyler.baker@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org From: Tyler Baker This is a follow up series to address a simple lib.mk installation issue[1]. Essentially, install is being called without checking that there exists test artifacts to install, which in turn causes 'make install' to fail. By creating a simple loop we can avoid if/elif/else blocks to determine if install actually needs to be called. I've tested this series by building and deploying tests on x86[2], arm64[3], and arm[4] platforms. This series is based on next-20150512. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/20/746 [2] http://lava.kernelci.org/scheduler/job/83448/log_file#L_40 [3] http://lava.kernelci.org/scheduler/job/83665/log_file#L_44 [4] http://lava.kernelci.org/scheduler/job/83442/log_file#L_65 Tyler Baker (2): selftests/lib.mk: fix INSTALL_RULE selftests/breakpoints: only set TEST_PROGS when built tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile | 3 +-- tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4