From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:53:41 -0800 Message-ID: <1487872421.14159.38.camel__10353.1771376312$1487893970$gmane$org@perches.com> References: <1487870304.14159.29.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Emil Velikov Cc: "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux , Alexander Shishkin , ML nouveau , Linux-ALSA , dri-devel , "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, Rob Herring , linux-omap , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, amd-gfx mailing list , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 17:41 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 17:18, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older > > > > pr_warning in the kernel source tree. > > > > > > > > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. > > > > > > > > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate > > > > define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is > > > > not used in tools/. > > > > > > > > Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. > > > > [] > > > Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in? > > > > After all of these actually get applied, > > and maybe a cycle or two later, one would > > get sent. > > > > By which point you'll get a few reincarnation of it. So you'll have to > do the same exercise again :-( Maybe to one or two files. Not a big deal. > I guess the question is - are you expecting to get the series merged > all together/via one tree ? No. The only person that could do that effectively is Linus. > If not, your plan is perfectly reasonable.