All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Yang Bo <yangbo@deepin.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH -tip 5/9] x86: kprobes: Ignore break_handler
Date: Fri,  9 Mar 2018 21:37:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152059906701.4214.6794382165554467552.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152059891712.4214.9539716544254881611.stgit@devbox>

Remove break_handler related code since that was used
only for jprobe and jprobe is removed now.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h |   10 ----------
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c   |   13 ++-----------
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c |   16 ++--------------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
index ae38dccf0c8f..2b949f4fd4d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h
@@ -105,14 +105,4 @@ static inline unsigned long __recover_optprobed_insn(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, unsig
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
-extern int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-			   struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb);
-#else
-static inline int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-				  struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index f5b09b0850ad..7663f23aa860 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -686,10 +686,8 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			/*
 			 * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
 			 * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
-			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
-			 * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry
-			 * for jprobe processing, so get out doing nothing
-			 * more here.
+			 * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it modified
+			 * regs->ip so no singlestep is needed.
 			 */
 			if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
 				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
@@ -708,13 +706,6 @@ int kprobe_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		regs->ip = (unsigned long)addr;
 		preempt_enable_no_resched();
 		return 1;
-	} else if (kprobe_running()) {
-		p = __this_cpu_read(current_kprobe);
-		if (p->break_handler && p->break_handler(p, regs)) {
-			if (!skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb))
-				setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
-			return 1;
-		}
 	} /* else: not a kprobe fault; let the kernel handle it */
 
 	preempt_enable_no_resched();
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
index 8dc0161cec8f..c8696f2a583f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 #include "common.h"
 
 static nokprobe_inline
-void __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
+void skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		      struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_ip)
 {
 	/*
@@ -43,18 +43,6 @@ void __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		regs->ip = orig_ip;
 }
 
-int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
-		    struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
-{
-	if (kprobe_ftrace(p)) {
-		__skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
-		preempt_enable_no_resched();
-		return 1;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(skip_singlestep);
-
 /* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes -- called under preepmt disabed */
 void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
 			   struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -80,7 +68,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
 		__this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
 		kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
 		if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
-			__skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_ip);
+			skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_ip);
 			preempt_enable_no_resched();
 		}
 		/*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-09 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-09 12:35 [RFC PATCH -tip 0/9] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:35 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 1/9] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:36 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 2/9] x86: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:36 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 3/9] kprobes: Remove jprobe data structure and interfaces Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:37 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 4/9] kprobes: Ignore break_handler Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-03-09 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 6/9] kprobes: Remove break_handler from struct kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:38 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 7/9] x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:39 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 8/9] error-injection: Fix to not enabling preemption in pre_handler Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-10  8:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-11 15:05     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 12:39 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 9/9] tracing: kprobes: Fix to not enabling preemption Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-09 23:54 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 0/9] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Steven Rostedt
2018-03-10 13:55   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-10  8:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-11 15:13   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152059906701.4214.6794382165554467552.stgit@devbox \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo@deepin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.