All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/13] mm/mempolicy: VMA allocation for many preferred
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:40:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1615952410-36895-11-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1615952410-36895-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com>

From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>

This patch implements MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY for alloc_pages_vma(). Like
alloc_pages_current(), alloc_pages_vma() needs to support policy based
decisions if they've been configured via mbind(2).

The temporary "hack" of treating MPOL_PREFERRED and MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY
can now be removed with this, too.

All the actual machinery to make this work was part of
("mm/mempolicy: Create a page allocator for policy")

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-11-ben.widawsky@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index a92efe7..8fe76a7 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2273,8 +2273,6 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 {
 	struct mempolicy *pol;
 	struct page *page;
-	int preferred_nid;
-	nodemask_t *nmask;
 
 	pol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr);
 
@@ -2288,6 +2286,7 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	}
 
 	if (unlikely(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && hugepage)) {
+		nodemask_t *nmask;
 		int hpage_node = node;
 
 		/*
@@ -2301,10 +2300,26 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * does not allow the current node in its nodemask, we allocate
 		 * the standard way.
 		 */
-		if ((pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED ||
-		     pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) &&
-		    !(pol->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL))
+		if (pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED || !(pol->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)) {
 			hpage_node = first_node(pol->nodes);
+		} else if (pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) {
+			struct zoneref *z;
+
+			/*
+			 * In this policy, with direct reclaim, the normal
+			 * policy based allocation will do the right thing - try
+			 * twice using the preferred nodes first, and all nodes
+			 * second.
+			 */
+			if (gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) {
+				page = alloc_pages_policy(pol, gfp, order, NUMA_NO_NODE);
+				goto out;
+			}
+
+			z = first_zones_zonelist(node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), GFP_HIGHUSER),
+						 gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER), &pol->nodes);
+			hpage_node = zone_to_nid(z->zone);
+		}
 
 		nmask = policy_nodemask(gfp, pol);
 		if (!nmask || node_isset(hpage_node, *nmask)) {
@@ -2330,9 +2345,7 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		}
 	}
 
-	nmask = policy_nodemask(gfp, pol);
-	preferred_nid = policy_node(gfp, pol, node);
-	page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp, order, preferred_nid, nmask);
+	page = alloc_pages_policy(pol, gfp, order, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 	mpol_cond_put(pol);
 out:
 	return page;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-17  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17  3:39 [PATCH v4 00/13] Introduced multi-preference mempolicy Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] mm/mempolicy: Add comment for missing LOCAL Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] mm/mempolicy: convert single preferred_node to full nodemask Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:17   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] mm/mempolicy: Add MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY for multiple preferred nodes Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:50   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-20  7:16     ` Feng Tang
2021-05-13  7:23       ` Feng Tang
2021-05-13  7:25       ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] mempolicy: kill MPOL_F_LOCAL bit Feng Tang
2021-05-13 13:55         ` Andi Kleen
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] mm/mempolicy: allow preferred code to take a nodemask Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:55   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-19  8:49     ` Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] mm/mempolicy: refactor rebind code for PREFERRED_MANY Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:57   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] mm/mempolicy: kill v.preferred_nodes Feng Tang
2021-04-14 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] mm/mempolicy: handle MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY like BIND Feng Tang
2021-04-14 13:01   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] mm/mempolicy: Create a page allocator for policy Feng Tang
2021-04-14 13:08   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15  8:17     ` Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] mm/mempolicy: Thread allocation for many preferred Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:40 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2021-04-14 13:14   ` [PATCH v4 10/13] mm/mempolicy: VMA " Michal Hocko
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page " Feng Tang
2021-03-17  7:19   ` kernel test robot
2021-03-17  7:19     ` kernel test robot
2021-04-14 13:25   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15  7:41     ` Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] mm/mempolicy: Advertise new MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY Feng Tang
2021-03-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] mem/mempolicy: unify mpol_new_preferred() and mpol_new_preferred_many() Feng Tang
2021-04-14 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Introduced multi-preference mempolicy Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1615952410-36895-11-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com \
    --to=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.