From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-20.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E03C4320E for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA4461051 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235510AbhHQURd (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:17:33 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:34880 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234952AbhHQUPB (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:15:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:14:25 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1629231266; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Yid1/MucJ0awrQgqm5pSR7nHeuKu0/gigtyhpUNv8yo=; b=cZGpSVVXEW2nxaIIhc2NVi+Qtrcu2gm8noFqnC1w8jA0pKyOvxvEJvsab4r4ZuYJ/s9fHa kcXokQljmSlHmMBenyOXKkuykiRpf2zr/W1vcHnlfmXgJoMeJDLagW+dnHpCE7O3kDxgiN 2523PCNXBnsWjNi9vGwUAogxBZ4NgvPw965OiUwzWaUvdLE/bPdWFEuUqdpPTdw2GfRYkP JvKtPM3AwQ6Z2Bzx/zeHFaxKuSJikj+WBRLhqe4ux51UUEPBs3WDBHGIzRDQImS1xIWikT xnphyLdk3Hdmkn9GHeA/cBWvAsvvPGm9JplvsGYErDA5vsUnmI9D0+zZakZ18A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1629231266; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Yid1/MucJ0awrQgqm5pSR7nHeuKu0/gigtyhpUNv8yo=; b=6Guh4u81d0CwLx8uj9SvaTpzjTExg/k8WYRgDRS4AgOzcKKBtmE+EcreIyAXRD9wWWgw9Z wLzvesCpOHsFfhBw== From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" Sender: tip-bot2@linutronix.de Reply-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20210815211303.197113263@linutronix.de> References: <20210815211303.197113263@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <162923126579.25758.4236219925296340637.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> Robot-ID: Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact to get blacklisted from these emails Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip: Commit-ID: 7980aa397cc0968ea3ffee7a985c31c92ad84f81 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7980aa397cc0968ea3ffee7a985c31c92ad84f81 Author: Thomas Gleixner AuthorDate: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:28:09 +02:00 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitterDate: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:20:14 +02:00 locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Prepare for the required state aware handling of waiter wakeups via wake_q and switch the rtmutex code over to the rtmutex specific wrapper. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.197113263@linutronix.de --- kernel/futex.c | 8 ++++---- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 12 ++++++------ kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 19 ++++++++----------- kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 6eab247..21625cb 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -1493,11 +1493,11 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q) */ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) { - u32 curval, newval; struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter; struct task_struct *new_owner; bool postunlock = false; - DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); + u32 curval, newval; int ret = 0; top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(&pi_state->pi_mutex); @@ -1549,14 +1549,14 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_ * not fail. */ pi_state_update_owner(pi_state, new_owner); - postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q); + postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wqh); } out_unlock: raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); if (postunlock) - rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q); + rt_mutex_postunlock(&wqh); return ret; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 35f7685..5f0d072 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, * * Called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. */ -static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, +static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; @@ -1054,10 +1054,10 @@ static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, * deboost but before waking our donor task, hence the preempt_disable() * before unlock. * - * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_postunlock(); + * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_wake_up_q(); */ preempt_disable(); - wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task); + rt_mutex_wake_q_add(wqh, waiter); raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); } @@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) */ static void __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { - DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); unsigned long flags; /* irqsave required to support early boot calls */ @@ -1381,10 +1381,10 @@ static void __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) * * Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock. */ - mark_wakeup_next_waiter(&wake_q, lock); + mark_wakeup_next_waiter(&wqh, lock); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q); + rt_mutex_wake_up_q(&wqh); } static __always_inline void __rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c index c5136f4..56403dc 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c @@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ int __sched __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) * do not use the fast-path, can be simple and will not need to retry. * * @lock: The rt_mutex to be unlocked - * @wake_q: The wake queue head from which to get the next lock waiter + * @wqh: The wake queue head from which to get the next lock waiter */ bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, - struct wake_q_head *wake_q) + struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh) { lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -157,23 +157,23 @@ bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup. preempt_disable() * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock(). */ - mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock); + mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wqh, lock); return true; /* call postunlock() */ } void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) { - DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); + DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); unsigned long flags; bool postunlock; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q); + postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wqh); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); if (postunlock) - rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q); + rt_mutex_postunlock(&wqh); } /** @@ -441,12 +441,9 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) /* * Performs the wakeup of the top-waiter and re-enables preemption. */ -void __sched rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q) +void __sched rt_mutex_postunlock(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh) { - wake_up_q(wake_q); - - /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */ - preempt_enable(); + rt_mutex_wake_up_q(wqh); } #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h index 9e2f1db..ff36316 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h @@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ extern int __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *l); extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock); extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, - struct wake_q_head *wake_q); + struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh); -extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q); +extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh); /* * Must be guarded because this header is included from rcu/tree_plugin.h