All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/urgent] perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output() and perf_mmap_close()
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:35:22 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <165779852269.15455.12378628877885813176.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsQ3jm2GR38SW7uD@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     68e3c69803dada336893640110cb87221bb01dcf
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/68e3c69803dada336893640110cb87221bb01dcf
Author:        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 05 Jul 2022 15:07:26 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:29:12 +02:00

perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output() and perf_mmap_close()

Yang Jihing reported a race between perf_event_set_output() and
perf_mmap_close():

	CPU1					CPU2

	perf_mmap_close(e2)
	  if (atomic_dec_and_test(&e2->rb->mmap_count)) // 1 - > 0
	    detach_rest = true

						ioctl(e1, IOC_SET_OUTPUT, e2)
						  perf_event_set_output(e1, e2)

	  ...
	  list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &e2->rb->event_list, rb_entry)
	    ring_buffer_attach(e, NULL);
	    // e1 isn't yet added and
	    // therefore not detached

						    ring_buffer_attach(e1, e2->rb)
						      list_add_rcu(&e1->rb_entry,
								   &e2->rb->event_list)

After this; e1 is attached to an unmapped rb and a subsequent
perf_mmap() will loop forever more:

	again:
		mutex_lock(&e->mmap_mutex);
		if (event->rb) {
			...
			if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&e->rb->mmap_count)) {
				...
				mutex_unlock(&e->mmap_mutex);
				goto again;
			}
		}

The loop in perf_mmap_close() holds e2->mmap_mutex, while the attach
in perf_event_set_output() holds e1->mmap_mutex. As such there is no
serialization to avoid this race.

Change perf_event_set_output() to take both e1->mmap_mutex and
e2->mmap_mutex to alleviate that problem. Additionally, have the loop
in perf_mmap() detach the rb directly, this avoids having to wait for
the concurrent perf_mmap_close() to get around to doing it to make
progress.

Fixes: 9bb5d40cd93c ("perf: Fix mmap() accounting hole")
Reported-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YsQ3jm2GR38SW7uD@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 80782cd..d2b3549 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6253,10 +6253,10 @@ again:
 
 		if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&event->rb->mmap_count)) {
 			/*
-			 * Raced against perf_mmap_close() through
-			 * perf_event_set_output(). Try again, hope for better
-			 * luck.
+			 * Raced against perf_mmap_close(); remove the
+			 * event and try again.
 			 */
+			ring_buffer_attach(event, NULL);
 			mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
 			goto again;
 		}
@@ -11825,14 +11825,25 @@ err_size:
 	goto out;
 }
 
+static void mutex_lock_double(struct mutex *a, struct mutex *b)
+{
+	if (b < a)
+		swap(a, b);
+
+	mutex_lock(a);
+	mutex_lock_nested(b, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+}
+
 static int
 perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *output_event)
 {
 	struct perf_buffer *rb = NULL;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!output_event)
+	if (!output_event) {
+		mutex_lock(&event->mmap_mutex);
 		goto set;
+	}
 
 	/* don't allow circular references */
 	if (event == output_event)
@@ -11870,8 +11881,15 @@ perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *output_event)
 	    event->pmu != output_event->pmu)
 		goto out;
 
+	/*
+	 * Hold both mmap_mutex to serialize against perf_mmap_close().  Since
+	 * output_event is already on rb->event_list, and the list iteration
+	 * restarts after every removal, it is guaranteed this new event is
+	 * observed *OR* if output_event is already removed, it's guaranteed we
+	 * observe !rb->mmap_count.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock_double(&event->mmap_mutex, &output_event->mmap_mutex);
 set:
-	mutex_lock(&event->mmap_mutex);
 	/* Can't redirect output if we've got an active mmap() */
 	if (atomic_read(&event->mmap_count))
 		goto unlock;
@@ -11881,6 +11899,12 @@ set:
 		rb = ring_buffer_get(output_event);
 		if (!rb)
 			goto unlock;
+
+		/* did we race against perf_mmap_close() */
+		if (!atomic_read(&rb->mmap_count)) {
+			ring_buffer_put(rb);
+			goto unlock;
+		}
 	}
 
 	ring_buffer_attach(event, rb);
@@ -11888,20 +11912,13 @@ set:
 	ret = 0;
 unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&event->mmap_mutex);
+	if (output_event)
+		mutex_unlock(&output_event->mmap_mutex);
 
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void mutex_lock_double(struct mutex *a, struct mutex *b)
-{
-	if (b < a)
-		swap(a, b);
-
-	mutex_lock(a);
-	mutex_lock_nested(b, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-}
-
 static int perf_event_set_clock(struct perf_event *event, clockid_t clk_id)
 {
 	bool nmi_safe = false;

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 12:00 [PATCH v2] perf/core: Fix data race between perf_event_set_output and perf_mmap_close Yang Jihong
2022-07-04 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-05  2:07   ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-05 13:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-06 12:29     ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-09  2:00       ` Yang Jihong
2022-07-14 11:35     ` tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=165779852269.15455.12378628877885813176.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.