All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	horia geanta <horia.geanta@nxp.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	aymen sghaier <aymen.sghaier@nxp.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	davem <davem@davemloft.net>, James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	kernel <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
	Udit Agarwal <udit.agarwal@nxp.com>,
	Jan Luebbe <j.luebbe@pengutronix.de>, david <david@sigma-star.at>,
	Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@nxp.com>,
	linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list, ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:59:26 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1846277009.140163.1617285566823.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFA6WYODfsMTiCEyFA2aRGm+UQE0OTe-ui7mMSK-cqUR_YJFTA@mail.gmail.com>

Sumit,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> In this case why would one prefer to use CAAM when you have standards
> compliant TPM-Chip which additionally offers sealing to specific PCR
> (integrity measurement) values.

I don't think we can dictate what good/sane solutions are and which are not.
Both CAAM and TPM have pros and cons, I don't see why supporting both is a bad idea.

>> > IMHO allowing only one backend at the same time is a little over simplified.
>>
>> It is, but I'd rather leave this until it's actually needed.
>> What can be done now is adopting a format for the exported keys that would
>> make this extension seamless in future.
>>
> 
> +1

As long we don't make multiple backends at runtime impossible I'm
fine and will happily add support for it when needed. :-)

Thanks,
//richard

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-16 17:01 [PATCH v1 0/3] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-16 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] crypto: caam - add in-kernel interface for blob generator Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-21 20:46   ` Horia Geantă
2021-03-23 16:41     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-16 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] KEYS: trusted: implement fallback to kernel RNG Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-16 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-16 19:22   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-17 13:58     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-16 23:14   ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-17  7:39     ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-17  8:07       ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-17 14:02     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-30 21:28       ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-21 20:48   ` Horia Geantă
2021-03-23 16:35     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-23 18:07       ` Mimi Zohar
2021-03-24  9:26         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-24 10:47           ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-24 14:07             ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-25  5:26               ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-27 12:41                 ` David Gstir
2021-03-28 20:37                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-29 10:11                     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-31 23:29                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-30  7:26                     ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-31 23:30                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-04-01  7:41                         ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-30 21:47                     ` Eric Biggers
2021-03-31 23:31                       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-31 23:34                         ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-01  1:11                           ` Herbert Xu
2021-04-01  5:50                             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-04-01  6:03                               ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-01  5:46                           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-03-24 16:14         ` James Bottomley
2021-03-24 20:49           ` Mimi Zohar
2021-03-24 21:58             ` James Bottomley
2021-04-02  1:49           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2021-03-31 18:35   ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 10:15     ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 10:23       ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-16 23:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] " Richard Weinberger
2021-03-17 14:08   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-30 21:50     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 10:04       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 10:20         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 10:28           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 10:53             ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 10:57               ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 11:05                 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 11:13                   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 11:16                     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-30 22:04     ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-30 22:16       ` James Bottomley
2021-03-31 18:36         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-31 18:49           ` James Bottomley
2021-03-31 19:36             ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 10:06               ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 13:20                 ` Sumit Garg
2021-04-01 18:26                   ` James Bottomley
2021-04-01 12:55       ` Sumit Garg
2021-04-01 13:17         ` Richard Weinberger
2021-04-01 13:30           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-04-01 13:52             ` Sumit Garg
2021-04-01 13:59               ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2021-04-01 14:12                 ` Sumit Garg
2021-04-01 11:11     ` David Howells
2021-03-21 20:01 ` Horia Geantă
2021-03-23 16:34   ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-24  6:23     ` Sumit Garg
2021-03-23 16:37   ` Ahmad Fatoum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1846277009.140163.1617285566823.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=aymen.sghaier@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=franck.lenormand@nxp.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
    --cc=j.luebbe@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=udit.agarwal@nxp.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.