All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:08:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1855683.1QnG4Fe4Hq@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161010202322.labiotb5dsf4oyfi@treble>

On Monday, October 10, 2016 3:23:22 PM CEST Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> Thanks for reporting it.  It looks like 'mtune=atom' sometimes makes a
> slight change to one of the stack frame setup instructions.  Instead of:
> 
>   move rsp, rbp
> 
> It sometimes does:
> 
>   lea (%rsp),%rbp
> 
> They're two different instructions, but they have the same result.  It's
> an easy fix for objtool.  I'll post a patch soon.
> 
> 

Ah, good to hear. I've replaced my patch with yours in my randconfig
tests now and will let you know if there are any other warnings on
atom. I've done a few thousand x86 randconfig builds now and done private
patches for all warnings I got (I previously had fixes only for the arm
warnings). I found objtool warnings for a few files in some configurations
that do not involve -mtune=atom, maybe you can also look at what
is going on there as I have no idea for how to address them:

drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.o: warning: objtool: fnic_log_q_error() falls through to next function fnic_handle_link_event()
drivers/scsi/snic/snic_res.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_comp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_completer()+0x2f3: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_responder()+0x10f: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer
kernel/locking/rwsem.o: warning: objtool: down_write_killable()+0x16: call without frame pointer save/setup

I can provide additional information for reproducing them if it's
not immediately obvious what the problems are.

Thanks,

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-11  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-10 12:56 [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-10 20:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11  8:08   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-11 12:20     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 13:30       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11 15:05         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 15:51           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 20:38             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-12 13:01               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-13 12:46               ` Another gcc corruption bug (was Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings) Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-13 17:57                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-10-13 20:15                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01  9:34               ` [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01  9:45                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 14:40                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 15:27                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 16:53                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 22:05                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 22:42                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02  1:03                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02  6:31                             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 12:49                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 13:46                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 14:08                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 14:46                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 22:49                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 23:05                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-03  8:58                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-03 11:27                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 14:31                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 15:21                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 18:25                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 22:43                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 22:57                         ` [PATCH] objtool: fix another gcc jump table detection issue Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:01                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11  1:53 ` [PATCH] objtool: support '-mtune=atom' stack frame setup instruction Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1855683.1QnG4Fe4Hq@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.