All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:42:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1defaf580702091542m19034fddu9e1d3eb4fccf0d64@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <012b01c74ca1$8ee35fe0$01c4af0a@Glamdring>

On 2/10/07, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com> wrote:
> The number of users far outweisghs the number of implementers
> and I think that we need to look at it from their point of view.

Would help a lot to have some of those users help with testing though.

> We are not introducing any new interfaces here,
> just using the existing interfaces.
> This means that it will not be harder to do any modifications
> *after* the sam926x patches are applied.
> It will be easier since you have better overview.

Whatever. Please let me know when you're ready to continue.

> The only alternative I can see is that you take over
> the responsibility for both AVR32 and AT91 U-boot
> and test all modifications on all boards before submission
> - Still with availability of working solution as the highest priority.

I don't think that's going to happen. Besides, having the same person
implement and test the code usually doesn't work very well anyway, so
if we're going to do this we need people willing to test
probably-working-but-still-experimental stuff.

I'm of course not saying that I can't be bothered to test my
modifications before submitting, but relying on me to implement _and_
test everything on all configurations is just insane.

Haavard

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-09 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c88e466f0702050752t16c18251gcddf40a7ec95469@mail.gmail.com>
2007-02-07 23:17 ` [U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-08  6:06   ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-08  8:34     ` Michel Benoit
2007-02-08 19:25       ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-08 20:58         ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-08 22:20           ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 15:45             ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-09 19:11               ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 19:54                 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-09 19:39               ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-09 22:18                 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 22:58                   ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-09 23:20                     ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-09 23:42                       ` Haavard Skinnemoen [this message]
2007-02-10  0:10                         ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-10  1:18                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-10  9:05                         ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-10  7:23                     ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-10  1:15                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-10  7:32                     ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-10  9:29                     ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-10  1:53       ` Ken Watson
     [not found] <mailman.5069.1170973304.16820.u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
2007-02-08 22:57 ` Ivan Kuten
     [not found] <mailman.12584.1171099992.16820.u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
2007-02-10 20:31 ` Ivan Kuten
2007-02-11 16:43   ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 18:04     ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-11 19:42       ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 20:23         ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-11 20:29           ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 20:54             ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-11 21:10           ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-11 21:39             ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 23:45               ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-12  0:26                 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-12 15:18                   ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-12 18:40                     ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-12 19:36                       ` Stefan Roese
2007-02-12 19:37                       ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-02-12 20:05                         ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 21:54       ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-02-11 11:49 Michel Benoit
2007-02-11 16:20 ` Ulf Samuelsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1defaf580702091542m19034fddu9e1d3eb4fccf0d64@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.