From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700EDC072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3608E20863 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="pZn/C3KB"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=lohutok.net header.i=@lohutok.net header.b="l8PQ2qIn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731882AbfEXRPG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56606 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725777AbfEXRPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67F1152FEF; Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to:cc :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=pbxznWy+2Z5Y 3N3dw7q8cEL7AZA=; b=pZn/C3KB7i3zpkBds3/IIMb6RApCmKnK4/5HIojvAuQv 5m3DaZAZYGRg6Y77ZOrC0pYXNnEZalENR7jYQYP/0sHer17leIrm0Wbzpne0+Z/K qFSz31vJY4M2Ohmh098gKxFJKnj5wH5jzi5YXKBLmOCKWDLkSqsHCSuwLwtLJ3M= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91149152FED; Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lohutok.net; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2018-11.pbsmtp; bh=qlr7qqeIrKzF46Wpyn74+V46te8Yhf7IDqsIHYeOpLE=; b=l8PQ2qInC1TddYDIMIJOmQWHAETOqZcx9dr4Mbq5xd7NcLukNzxeVpMpH3DnYR56ljB9BX1kLZqPrBLqZWjlyjblkriHP5J9w2n6bGtEiRQJrusqxcngL49kKgqiHeZCqkFo0sbiAEVGE5gedvEhUVlHIhDhyOxT/UoK/dQwwZ8= Received: from [10.0.0.75] (unknown [24.47.52.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BA45152FEB; Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [Batch 5 - patch 24/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 124 To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org References: <20190523091437.334232837@linutronix.de> <20190523091651.596776854@linutronix.de> <7e67dcba-525e-993d-5c3d-0f902022f270@lohutok.net> From: Allison Randal Message-ID: <1f2c1430-759e-1647-3578-65ecd8607603@lohutok.net> Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:01 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 783CD7CC-7E47-11E9-9BB4-46F8B7964D18-44123303!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On 5/24/19 12:16 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Sure. I did not mean to call for ad hoc decisions. The reason why I posted > this is that I worked on the disclaimer collection I posted yesterday again > and did some comparisions to the full text disclaimer in GPLv2. Some of > those magic disclaimers have a high similarity index :) Yup, I was agreeing with you. :) And, also thanks for the more automated analysis of the weird variants. Allison