From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56236C4F2 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id e74so14715321wmg.3 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:18:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cBxfWP9JVP4L+uAdZkoU6gCelS45nhi58sQ/J4gZRPk=; b=Jlka4eCwo/awSZfWCGrw7us2VhfpeoxhPGuDwfG39kZ0bxCc+vFvywXhLgJVDxNSMS y1NTOfhm/PZCS+Jzv/O9lrR3Hx7zduMcrBIQ/A/GdDOW7arnmcG1bCtI2DIHgradkAde 9bAkyg9fPj3I5U2nlRwYEDu9bz8Bzai9nJOtA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cBxfWP9JVP4L+uAdZkoU6gCelS45nhi58sQ/J4gZRPk=; b=jXGK4HBksOb7Bt+dpCgNZL1qC9jcqh8JKqLciUmwwYpRgoOs87LLc/7nVaq3PmbUxA 7Rbe8kH+WAldnFk3m88uVXXlDGgYJdYzhTmHNb7O2YQKLvFYzGnVeRL9TTSPrtNX76lZ jyL6tORv5ALVT4WO0W+P6s7CqJSW2dJYVr6ST1ow996k6JnsxWEkDIcgKXz7fU7eHCsf WLh7Zt4PlojIakb5BbFdul9ZeAphFi35HxLIDMVOXD88jGc20JmaeqyERc9EWtNJo7cU VVsgbiaKZIc2aMxuKNxpmrKQ5dQQ1Iwpgqn8hH2+an/Qni1wnSN9KwY3Z2AuJvXNpGYg s5iA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU5uygpVvF0vg3Yemst4eTszDUMLXrQOofi5HdgJFzYmXvLst0J HdXtQSRwrMGia7oSiwdfhN8pbA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz94B5uJztBvdf/5GWq/IJ9PwqeGBuUsiMxS0SDWgdFuInW/w2i8dXx4zIXfa5fqOK+T+9jxw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4b18:: with SMTP id y24mr939453wma.111.1552951100642; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y140sm2079533wmd.18.2019.03.18.16.18.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1fb71bec0195779b572ef9870d2efbb2bea40abd.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Alexander Kanavin , Otavio Salvador Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:18:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: <81AEDE73-7DD8-4F69-BF8D-BC2BF92FFC06@gmail.com> References: <20190318133618.4022-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <166926B2-31F9-4290-A4B8-1EC6486C7357@gmail.com> <81AEDE73-7DD8-4F69-BF8D-BC2BF92FFC06@gmail.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.31.90-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] openssl: Use the c_rehash shell re-implementation for target X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:18:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was asked for my views on this thread. OE is primarily targeting embedded systems and removing a perl dependency from target is something we do care about and a significant win. As such I'm tempted to merge this patch in for that reason. The fact we're successfully using it at rootfs time is a good sign. I was also made aware that on target ca-certificates is currently broken by the last change in this area and this patch does in fact fix that again. This tells us nobody uses it that heavily on target as nobody noticed. It also means we could do with some better tests :/. I think the commit message could use some work but IMO this patch probably is worth it for OE. I also note with interest that upstream are writing a C version as that would solve much of this debate once and for all meaning we might not have to carry this change forever. It would be good if the new upstream version cared about sysroot style usage... Cheers, Richard