From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Subject: Re: Sata_via problems in a Vintage2-AE1: Resume Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:23:18 +0100 Message-ID: <200702151223.19333.lepalom@wol.es> References: <200702090010.06897.lepalom@wol.es> <200702131711.11781.lepalom@wol.es> <200702131719.47507.jdelvare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-13 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from violet.upc.es ([147.83.2.51]:34856 "EHLO violet.upc.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965885AbXBOLXj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:23:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200702131719.47507.jdelvare@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 17:19, Jean Delvare va escriure: > Le Mardi 13 F=E9vrier 2007 17:11, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a =E9crit= =A0: > > A Dimarts 13 Febrer 2007 12:20, Jean Delvare va escriure: > > (...) > > > > > > > *If* the VT8251 needs the VIA IRQ quirk, then the attached pa= tch > > > > > may help. Leopold, can you give it a try? > > > > > > > > Well, making your patch to the vanilla 2.6.20 the result is the= same. > > > > The box doesn't boot. Always the same problem .... > > > > > > If it's not a VIA IRQ problem, then there's nothing more I can do= , > > > sorry. Someone else will have to look into the problem. > > > > > > Out of curiosity, with my patch applied, did you see any "VIA VLi= nk IRQ > > > fixup" messages on the console? > > > > No :-( > > OK, so maybe the VT8251 actually no longer needs the quirk. Thanks fo= r > testing and reporting. Hi people, =20 arriving to this state. What do you recommend? I have the box more or less working with irqpoll but with a lot of mess= ages: APIC error on CPU0: 08(08) and the box doesn't boot without the irqpoll option. Do you think that = the=20 2.6.21 have some kind of changes in this area? Thank's for all for you patience and your messages. Best regards, Leo