From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933187Ab0LTUrh (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:47:37 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:54348 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932769Ab0LTUrg (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:47:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:47:27 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "J.H." Cc: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Sedat Dilek , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , ftpadmin@kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 20 Message-Id: <20101221074727.00900015.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <4D0FA098.8000405@kernel.org> References: <20101220230007.e82487b8.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4D0FA098.8000405@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__21_Dec_2010_07_47_27_+1100_k1fezbPcLF.wpvjD" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__21_Dec_2010_07_47_27_+1100_k1fezbPcLF.wpvjD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:29:44 -0800 "J.H." wrote: > > Gingerbread released last week, loads have been spiking to well above > 300 on the frontend machines, RAM usage has been in the ~20G range (on > machines with 16G of RAM), and we've been running an *AVERAGE* of 2000+ > simultaneous GIT processes worldwide (normal is in the 100-200 range). >=20 > Bonus points that we blew a drive on one of the machines yesterday. >=20 > I don't think anyone was quite expecting the onslaught we have gotten > this time around, and I'm going to have to make some changes before the > next big release (mainly shifting Android over to the bigger machines) Thanks for the info. I figured something like that was up. I guess we all just need to be patient for a while. > With cyclical patterns of fast and slow syncs. We seem to be (right > now) in the middle of one of the slow cycles with the last few syncs > taking a couple of hours each. The culprit, for at least the current > sync, seems to be the box with the highest load and the blown drive, > which I'm also reluctant to disable since it's still handling it's fair > share of the load and dumping all of that onto the opposite US mirror > would not be good either. Fair enough. I normally wait for the sync to happen before I send out the linux-next release message each day. I will continue to wait for a while, but will lower my expectations :-) --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__21_Dec_2010_07_47_27_+1100_k1fezbPcLF.wpvjD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJND8DfAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbsHCwH/1TbL0uWeYX+zc1EH8VgadJF 8TF9izpYZNictB+ockomACFKdLU2HDf0AAYioTR2Rk98Ur6a2BdQnw/r4kxOkc8N LKmo2fIMDbeXWMmX065P57BurIQicS3aqSqxeu9qgJhDP/wgm98ubnJpCTojDcHZ LjB2R/F9NGcbeGONUmVUenZkYqfa72mlM91oj11gfQJdMaw6ZGMFdUjMoX79BATm R7ccdvmULy5RuQUHI2Hq+2cEkqPwQeCzK9uL8kQkz4jjGL4dp1fwIgYhSrO9c9UV VtBboarnx5EjoxgDHxwIzjx9TgghveQ3+uxtKso8f4AEh23BJxQl9K63Fpj7vy8= =giNY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__21_Dec_2010_07_47_27_+1100_k1fezbPcLF.wpvjD--