From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753615Ab1AYNr2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:47:28 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:60261 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753045Ab1AYNr1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:47:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=fbzjgGGrB8DBRiL7TlI5mDlIoRTwho2Orb9+hszfm0R4CkdxvoY9UtJQrf2SCVdXsP ZUn5Xqj88OWW/Gsj9QRbFMq0o99P8Dg13C8+alL7C+UqPbNPqy33EIaUsD4qoMnnSbnT 76uzNNRNFCbrg+3yey2sPKkI5MK+An5jTWrKE= Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:47:22 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: "Kanigeri, Hari" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm/omap: use system_wq in mailbox Message-ID: <20110125134722.GZ27510@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110104052421.GD6748@mtj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110104052421.GD6748@mtj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:24:21AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > Using dedicated workqueue or system_wq doesn't make any difference in > terms of execution latency anymore. Sleeping work items no longer > delay execution of other work items. If mailbox is very latency > sensitive, it might make sense to create a HIGHPRI workqueue but that > usually isn't necessary. Ping. Shall I apply the patch? Thanks. -- tejun