From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, San Mehat <san@google.com>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] Add oops notification chain.
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:48:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110126024831.GD28283@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinUmB003g3Cb0yUXf7LeTvc=BMWN6MGcGJW0QrJ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:21:03PM -0800, Aaron Durbin wrote:
> As Mike talked about it might be more desirable to actually pass a
> reason field that indicates the appropriate kernel event. However, the
> naming of some of the variables becomes less clear. Maybe name it
> panic_oops_notifier_list? That way there would only be a single
> notifier chain.
Yes, I think that's the better thing to do here instead of adding more
notifier chains. It would just start to get even messier than it
currently is :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 0:24 [PATCH v1 0/6] google firmware support Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 0:24 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] Add oops notification chain Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 2:06 ` Greg KH
2011-01-25 20:01 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 21:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-25 21:43 ` Aaron Durbin
2011-01-25 21:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-01-25 22:21 ` Aaron Durbin
2011-01-26 2:48 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-01-26 21:50 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 0:24 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] Introduce CONFIG_GOOGLE_FIRMWARE Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 0:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] driver: Google EFI SMI Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 3:17 ` Greg KH
2011-01-25 23:12 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-26 2:46 ` Greg KH
2011-01-26 23:58 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-27 1:22 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-27 23:41 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-28 2:56 ` Greg KH
2011-02-20 4:44 ` Matt Domsch
2011-02-21 13:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-01-27 10:43 ` Alan Cox
2011-01-27 19:22 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-28 2:55 ` Greg KH
2011-01-28 2:59 ` Greg KH
2011-01-25 0:24 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] driver: Google Bootlog Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 0:49 ` Alan Cox
2011-01-25 1:38 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 9:43 ` Alan Cox
2011-01-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] Allow prepending to the dmesg Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2011-01-25 0:25 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] driver: Google Memory Console Mike Waychison
2011-01-25 2:00 ` Greg KH
2011-01-25 3:01 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] google firmware support Greg KH
2011-01-25 19:58 ` Mike Waychison
2011-01-26 2:47 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110126024831.GD28283@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=adurbin@google.com \
--cc=dlaurie@google.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=san@google.com \
--cc=thockin@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.