Hi,

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:59:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >Well here is the dilemma: if I do it the other tree were done - I get
> >checkpatch error. 
> >You're right, adding this the way it's above doesn't look too good but when
> >I fixed the other three I was asked not to do so in this patch, which also
> >makes sense since it has nothing to do with SS support...
> >So what do I do? Submit with a checkpatch error?
> 
> It is nice to have things consistent and a follow-up patch could fix the
> checkpatch error(s).

I tend to like more when the cleanup comes beforehand ;-)

-- 
balbi