All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:54:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110825145432.GY31404@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314276949-23062-1-git-send-email-hector.oron@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:55:49PM +0100, hector.oron at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> [hector: rebase on current Sascha's 'imx-features' branch]
> Signed-off-by: Hector Oron <hector.oron@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/clock-mx51-mx53.c   |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/devices.c           |   10 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/mm.c                |    8 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx51.h |  162 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

While merging together my feature branch with the cleanup branch I
realized that I already have this patch in the original version from
Uwe. Instead of adding this patch to the features branch I based
the feature branch on the cleanup branch. Sorry for letting you repost
this.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-25 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24  8:03 i.MX multi SoC patches Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5 " Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM i.MX5: update defconfig Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM i.MX defconfigs: use one defconfig for all ARMv4/v5 SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 23:03 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-25  6:38   ` Sascha Hauer
2011-08-25 11:44   ` hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:44     ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:52     ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-25 12:55   ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 14:16     ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-08-25 14:54     ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-08-31 13:02 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-31 14:05   ` Shawn Guo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-25 10:05 [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110825145432.GY31404@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.