From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:52:57 +0800
Subject: announcing the clk-next branch
In-Reply-To: <CAJOA=zPdo8d7YMWDhdyNPkKQB_Ae_NiKPhEKxX2JYz=bpXXavQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJOA=zOGSh3et4nxE=JdojL4uDjgt8o+oiOU4pmbM=oU2U6prA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F9A395A.3030306@st.com>
 <20120427070925.GO2234@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
 <CAJOA=zPdo8d7YMWDhdyNPkKQB_Ae_NiKPhEKxX2JYz=bpXXavQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120428045255.GB9924@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:54:42AM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> Would I be allowed to rebase clk-next, or must it be stable?  If I
> cannot rebase it then I need a bit of time to remove the conflicting
> clkdev patches that Russell mentioned are already merged through him.
> 
Any branch that appears on arm-soc tree as a dependency should be
stable, I think.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn