From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:12:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120522101208.GB8382@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337643880.1997.166.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 04:44:39PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:13 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > So we really need to submit all possible CPUs here ^^^ to be able finding the
> > best/heaviest cluster out of the 'mask'.
> >
>
> I don't think we need to do anything fancy, like selecting the heaviest
> cluster out of the mask. Something like (cluster membership of first cpu
> in the mask) AND (mask) should be enough.
Hmm... the cost of selecting a cluster is cheap. It is called from a setup code
that should not be fast. Why not keep it?.. Well in case the data would show it
worth it.
What seems worthy though is sticking to the cluster which is currently in use
and at least one of its CPUs is still in the mask.
> thanks,
> suresh
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 10:26 [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 14:41 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-18 15:42 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-18 15:51 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 10:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21 7:11 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 9:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-19 20:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 8:13 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-21 23:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-05-22 9:36 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 23:44 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 23:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] x2apic, cluster: use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt desintation Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-22 7:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:21 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:39 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 17:42 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 17:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-22 20:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 15:04 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/x2apic/cluster: Use all the members of one cluster specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt destination tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 22:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-06 23:14 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 15:03 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/irq: Update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 15:31 ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 15:41 ` do_IRQ: 1.55 No irq handler for vector (irq -1) Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 16:24 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:28 ` Robert Richter
2012-08-07 17:47 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-07 17:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-08-07 20:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-07 22:39 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-08 8:58 ` Robert Richter
2012-08-08 11:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-08 19:16 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-08-14 17:02 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, apic: fix broken legacy interrupts in the logical apic mode tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-06-06 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-06 23:02 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-16 0:25 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-18 9:17 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-19 0:51 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Suresh Siddha
2012-06-19 23:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, x2apic: limit the vector reservation to the user specified mask Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20 5:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21 9:04 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:51 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20 5:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, apic: optimize cpu traversal in __assign_irq_vector() using domain membership Yinghai Lu
2012-06-21 8:31 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:53 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-20 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, irq: update irq_cfg domain unless the new affinity is a subset of the current domain Suresh Siddha
2012-06-21 11:00 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-06-21 21:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 10:12 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2012-05-21 8:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: x2apic/cluster: Make use of lowest priority delivery mode Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 9:36 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 12:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 14:48 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 15:22 ` Alexander Gordeev
2012-05-21 15:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-05-21 15:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:07 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-21 18:37 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 19:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 19:56 ` Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120522101208.GB8382@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
--to=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.