From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Luck,Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive tickless
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:18:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120614171800.72f02152@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120614134238.GD16848@somewhere>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:42:44 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:48:15PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:22:45 +0200
> > Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:21:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > You're right, I should have looked into CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING sooner
> > > > > > and see if I can reuse it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll try something with that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe sanitize all the variants under a single set of
> > > > > wrappers/callbacks?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, please!
> > >
> > > Sure, I'm working in it.
> >
> > Please keep me in the loop, I want to avoid that things break on s390. Thanks.
>
> Do you have any idea why s390 counts idle time from asm deep in the idle code
> rather than just hooking in account_system_vtime() like ppc or ia64?
Well what is idle time? For s390 it is the difference in the TOD clock between
the instruction that loaded the enabled-wait-PSW and the first instruction on
the interrupt handler. To get the best precision you need to get the TOD time
stamps as close to these two instructions as possible. For s390 it is the
following sequence:
STCK __IDLE_ENTER(%r2) # idle enter time stamp
ltr %r5,%r5
stpt __VQ_IDLE_ENTER(%r3)
jz psw_idle_lpsw
spt 0(%r1)
psw_idle_lpsw:
lpswe __SF_EMPTY(%r15)
<<< sleeping >>>
int_handler:
STCK __LC_INT_CLOCK # idle exit time stamp
There are at maximum 5 instructions between the STCK for the idle
enter time stamp and the lpswe that puts the cpu to sleep.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-13 16:19 [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive tickless Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] nohz: Add more comment about CONFIG_NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] nohz: Introduce adaptive nohz config Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] nohz: Generalize tickless cpu time accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] nohz: Account user and system times in adaptive nohz mode Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: Syscall hooks for " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86: Add adaptive tickless hooks on do_notify_resume() Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: Exception hooks for adaptive tickless Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-13 16:35 ` [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting " Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-14 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 11:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-14 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-14 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 11:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-14 12:48 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-06-14 13:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-14 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-14 17:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-15 12:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-14 13:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-14 15:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2012-06-15 17:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-06-18 10:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120614171800.72f02152@de.ibm.com \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=abogani@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
--cc=hakanakkan@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thebigcorporation@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.