From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/m25p80: add device tree probe support Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:01:22 +0200 Message-ID: <201206251801.22385.marex@denx.de> References: <1311601063-16581-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201206230415.18833.marex@denx.de> <20120625154006.GB2342@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120625154006.GB2342-rvtDTF3kK1ictlrPMvKcciBecyulp+rMXqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Shawn Guo Cc: patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Dear Shawn Guo, > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 04:15:18AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > So is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied? > > Let me remind Artem by resending the patch tomorrow. Actually ... the SPI does have the heuristics to probe this chip without the patch. But there was this discussion about them eventually being removed. That was a point raised by you I think. Is that still valid? Best regards, Marek Vasut From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut To: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/m25p80: add device tree probe support Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:01:22 +0200 References: <1311601063-16581-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201206230415.18833.marex@denx.de> <20120625154006.GB2342@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <20120625154006.GB2342@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206251801.22385.marex@denx.de> Cc: manu , patches@linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Grant Likely , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Shawn Guo, > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 04:15:18AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > So is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied? > > Let me remind Artem by resending the patch tomorrow. Actually ... the SPI does have the heuristics to probe this chip without the patch. But there was this discussion about them eventually being removed. That was a point raised by you I think. Is that still valid? Best regards, Marek Vasut From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:01:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mtd/m25p80: add device tree probe support In-Reply-To: <20120625154006.GB2342@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1311601063-16581-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <201206230415.18833.marex@denx.de> <20120625154006.GB2342@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <201206251801.22385.marex@denx.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Shawn Guo, > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 04:15:18AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > So is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied? > > Let me remind Artem by resending the patch tomorrow. Actually ... the SPI does have the heuristics to probe this chip without the patch. But there was this discussion about them eventually being removed. That was a point raised by you I think. Is that still valid? Best regards, Marek Vasut