All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:41:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121031194158.GB504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121031194135.GA504@redhat.com>

Currently the writer does msleep() plus synchronize_sched() 3 times
to acquire/release the semaphore, and during this time the readers
are blocked completely. Even if the "write" section was not actually
started or if it was already finished.

With this patch down_read/up_read does synchronize_sched() twice and
down_read/up_read are still possible during this time, just they use
the slow path.

percpu_down_write() first forces the readers to use rw_semaphore and
increment the "slow" counter to take the lock for reading, then it
takes that rw_semaphore for writing and blocks the readers.

Also. With this patch the code relies on the documented behaviour of
synchronize_sched(), it doesn't try to pair synchronize_sched() with
barrier.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h |   83 +++++---------------------------
 lib/Makefile                 |    2 +-
 lib/percpu-rwsem.c           |  106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 lib/percpu-rwsem.c

diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
index 250a4ac..7f738ca 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
@@ -2,82 +2,25 @@
 #define _LINUX_PERCPU_RWSEM_H
 
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
-#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
-#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
 
 struct percpu_rw_semaphore {
-	unsigned __percpu *counters;
-	bool locked;
-	struct mutex mtx;
+	int __percpu		*fast_read_ctr;
+	struct mutex		writer_mutex;
+	struct rw_semaphore	rw_sem;
+	atomic_t		slow_read_ctr;
+	wait_queue_head_t	write_waitq;
 };
 
-#define light_mb()	barrier()
-#define heavy_mb()	synchronize_sched()
+extern void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
+extern void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
 
-static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
-{
-	rcu_read_lock_sched();
-	if (unlikely(p->locked)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock_sched();
-		mutex_lock(&p->mtx);
-		this_cpu_inc(*p->counters);
-		mutex_unlock(&p->mtx);
-		return;
-	}
-	this_cpu_inc(*p->counters);
-	rcu_read_unlock_sched();
-	light_mb(); /* A, between read of p->locked and read of data, paired with D */
-}
+extern void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
+extern void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
 
-static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
-{
-	light_mb(); /* B, between read of the data and write to p->counter, paired with C */
-	this_cpu_dec(*p->counters);
-}
-
-static inline unsigned __percpu_count(unsigned __percpu *counters)
-{
-	unsigned total = 0;
-	int cpu;
-
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
-		total += ACCESS_ONCE(*per_cpu_ptr(counters, cpu));
-
-	return total;
-}
-
-static inline void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&p->mtx);
-	p->locked = true;
-	synchronize_sched(); /* make sure that all readers exit the rcu_read_lock_sched region */
-	while (__percpu_count(p->counters))
-		msleep(1);
-	heavy_mb(); /* C, between read of p->counter and write to data, paired with B */
-}
-
-static inline void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
-{
-	heavy_mb(); /* D, between write to data and write to p->locked, paired with A */
-	p->locked = false;
-	mutex_unlock(&p->mtx);
-}
-
-static inline int percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
-{
-	p->counters = alloc_percpu(unsigned);
-	if (unlikely(!p->counters))
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	p->locked = false;
-	mutex_init(&p->mtx);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *p)
-{
-	free_percpu(p->counters);
-	p->counters = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
-}
+extern int percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
+extern void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 821a162..4dad4a7 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
 	 idr.o int_sqrt.o extable.o \
 	 sha1.o md5.o irq_regs.o reciprocal_div.o argv_split.o \
 	 proportions.o flex_proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \
-	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o
+	 is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o percpu-rwsem.o
 
 lib-$(CONFIG_MMU) += ioremap.o
 lib-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpumask.o
diff --git a/lib/percpu-rwsem.c b/lib/percpu-rwsem.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..40a415d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/percpu-rwsem.c
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+
+int percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	brw->fast_read_ctr = alloc_percpu(int);
+	if (unlikely(!brw->fast_read_ctr))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	mutex_init(&brw->writer_mutex);
+	init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem);
+	atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr);
+	brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */
+}
+
+static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, int val)
+{
+	bool success = false;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	if (likely(!mutex_is_locked(&brw->writer_mutex))) {
+		__this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val);
+		success = true;
+	}
+	preempt_enable();
+
+	return success;
+}
+
+void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1)))
+		return;
+
+	down_read(&brw->rw_sem);
+	atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr);
+	up_read(&brw->rw_sem);
+}
+
+void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, -1)))
+		return;
+
+	/* false-positive is possible but harmless */
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr))
+		wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq);
+}
+
+static int clear_fast_read_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	int cpu, sum = 0;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		sum += per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu);
+		per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu) = 0;
+	}
+
+	return sum;
+}
+
+void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	/* also blocks update_fast_ctr() which checks mutex_is_locked() */
+	mutex_lock(&brw->writer_mutex);
+
+	/*
+	 * 1. Ensures mutex_is_locked() is visible to any down_read/up_read
+	 *    so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed.
+	 *
+	 * 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in
+	 *    update_fast_ctr().
+	 *
+	 * 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via
+	 *    fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return.
+	 */
+	synchronize_sched();
+
+	/* nobody can use fast_read_ctr, move its sum into slow_read_ctr */
+	atomic_add(clear_fast_read_ctr(brw), &brw->slow_read_ctr);
+
+	/* block the new readers completely */
+	down_write(&brw->rw_sem);
+
+	/* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */
+	wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr));
+}
+
+void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw)
+{
+	/* allow the new readers, but only the slow-path */
+	up_write(&brw->rw_sem);
+
+	/* insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read */
+	synchronize_sched();
+
+	mutex_unlock(&brw->writer_mutex);
+}
-- 
1.5.5.1



  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-31 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-15 19:09 [RFC PATCH 0/2] uprobes: register/unregister can race with fork Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 23:28   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-16 15:56     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 18:58       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-17 16:37         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-17 22:28           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-16 19:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-17 16:59     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-17 22:44       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-18 16:24         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 16:38           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-18 17:57             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18 19:28               ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 12:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 15:32                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 17:40                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-19 17:57                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-19 22:54                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24  3:08                         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25 14:09                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-25 23:40                             ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-26 12:06                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 13:22                                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-26 14:12                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 15:23                                     ` mark_files_ro && sb_end_write Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 16:09                                     ` [PATCH 1/2] brw_mutex: big read-write mutex Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-19 17:49                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 23:09                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 15:12                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-19 19:28               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-22 23:36                 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix and improvements for percpu-rw-semaphores (was: brw_mutex: big read-write mutex) Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-22 23:37                   ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-22 23:39                     ` [PATCH 2/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use rcu_read_lock_sched Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 16:16                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 17:18                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 18:20                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 18:43                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:43                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 14:54                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-25 15:07                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 16:15                             ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 16:59                     ` [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rw-semaphores: use light/heavy barriers Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 18:05                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 18:27                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 18:41                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 20:29                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 20:32                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-23 21:39                               ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 16:23                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 20:22                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 20:36                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-24 20:44                                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-24 23:57                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 12:39                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-10-25 13:48                                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 19:23                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 20:45                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-23 20:57                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-24 15:11                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-23 21:26                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-10-23 20:32                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-30 18:48                   ` [PATCH 0/2] fix and improvements for percpu-rw-semaphores (was: brw_mutex: big read-write mutex) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-31 19:41                     ` [PATCH 0/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-31 19:41                       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-11-01 15:10                         ` [PATCH 1/1] " Linus Torvalds
2012-11-01 15:34                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 18:06                           ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 18:06                             ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-07 17:04                               ` [PATCH v3 " Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-07 17:47                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-07 19:17                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-08 13:42                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08  1:23                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08  1:16                               ` [PATCH v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 13:33                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 16:27                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 13:48                             ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 13:48                               ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-08 20:07                                 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-08 21:08                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-08 23:41                                     ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-09  0:41                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09  3:23                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 16:35                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 16:59                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 12:47                                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-11-09 15:46                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 17:01                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-09 18:10                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-09 18:19                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-10  0:55                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-11 15:45                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-12 18:38                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-11 18:27                                   ` [PATCH -mm] percpu_rw_semaphore-reimplement-to-not-block-the-readers-unnecessari ly.fix Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-12 18:31                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-16 23:22                                     ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-18 19:32                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-01 15:43                         ` [PATCH 1/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily Paul E. McKenney
2012-11-01 18:33                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 16:18                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-15 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] uprobes: Use brw_mutex to fix register/unregister vs dup_mmap() race Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-18  7:03   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-04  8:47 [PATCH 1/1] percpu_rw_semaphore: reimplement to not block the readers unnecessarily George Spelvin
2012-11-04 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121031194158.GB504@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.