From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915: Fix location of stolen
 memory register for SandyBridge+
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:08:20 -0700
Message-ID: <20121101170820.20cb56a2@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1350666204-8101-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1350666204-8101-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<20121026145845.11025849@bwidawsk.net>
	<275ffc$75vg6a@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from shiva.chad-versace.us (209-20-75-48.static.cloud-ips.com
	[209.20.75.48])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172129E817
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu,  1 Nov 2012 17:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <275ffc$75vg6a@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:48:35 +0000
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:58:45 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:03:09 +0100
> > Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > A few of the earlier registers where enlarged and so the Base Data of
> > > Stolen Memory Register (BDSM) was pushed to 0xb0.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > 
> > This patch seems irrelevant to me. I have a i915_stolen_to_phys which
> > already looks correct (git blame shows you last updated it in April).
> > 
> > Can you help unconfuse me?
> 
> As the patch suggests the current registers being used by stolen-to-phys
> are incorrect for SNB+.
> -Chris
> 

It looks like all you've done here is fix up the bug you left from
patch2.

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center