From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:42833 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951Ab3BOJFf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:05:35 -0500 From: Martin Steigerwald To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Rebalancing RAID1 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:05:28 +0100 References: <201302141544.05747.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (sfid-20130215_095505_610309_779D53E5) In-Reply-To: Cc: Fredrik Tolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201302151005.29014.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Freitag, 15. Februar 2013 schrieb Fredrik Tolf: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Martin Steigerwald wrote: […] > > I´d restart the machine, see that BTRFS is using both devices again and > > then try the balance again. > > I mentioned it in another mail, but I'd very much prefer not to do that. > I'd like to try and solve this as I normally should when a drive fails. Well if Hugo´s solution with unmounting the FS, btrfs dev scan does not work, I see this my suggestion to reboot as making sense. I do not have to add more to my analysis. If any BTRFS developer or expert knows another solution in during runtime of the system, feel free :) So or so I think a kernel bug is involved here. And I think I remember having seen something like this during a balance attempt myself already, but it was just a test BTRFS and I was not sure of it. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7