From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755210Ab3BRMmd (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:42:33 -0500 Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.146]:35148 "EHLO e23smtp04.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755096Ab3BRMm3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:42:29 -0500 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 15/46] tick: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, walken@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:18 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218124018.26245.34450.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13021812-9264-0000-0000-0000032CB86A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c index f113755..d123a2c 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tick_do_broadcast(struct cpumask *mask) */ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void) { + get_online_cpus_atomic(); raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock); cpumask_and(to_cpumask(tmpmask), @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void) tick_do_broadcast(to_cpumask(tmpmask)); raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); } /* From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (e23smtp07.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e23smtp07.au.ibm.com", Issuer "GeoTrust SSL CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2DB2C04DE for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:42:25 +1100 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:35:09 +1000 Received: from d23relay05.au.ibm.com (d23relay05.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.152]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFC43578023 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:42:23 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r1ICTumH5833118 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:29:56 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r1ICgLh2003486 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:42:23 +1100 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v6 15/46] tick: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, namhyung@kernel.org Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:18 +0530 Message-ID: <20130218124018.26245.34450.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, sbw@mit.edu, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, walken@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c index f113755..d123a2c 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tick_do_broadcast(struct cpumask *mask) */ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void) { + get_online_cpus_atomic(); raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock); cpumask_and(to_cpumask(tmpmask), @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void) tick_do_broadcast(to_cpumask(tmpmask)); raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); } /* From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Srivatsa S. Bhat) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v6 15/46] tick: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to prevent CPU offline In-Reply-To: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20130218123714.26245.61816.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Message-ID: <20130218124018.26245.34450.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able to depend on preempt_disable() or local_irq_disable() to prevent CPUs from going offline from under us. Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going offline, while invoking from atomic context. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c index f113755..d123a2c 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static void tick_do_broadcast(struct cpumask *mask) */ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void) { + get_online_cpus_atomic(); raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock); cpumask_and(to_cpumask(tmpmask), @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void) tick_do_broadcast(to_cpumask(tmpmask)); raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock); + put_online_cpus_atomic(); } /*