From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757302Ab3BRUEz (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:04:55 -0500 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:35582 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753698Ab3BRUEy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:04:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:04:24 +0200 From: Felipe Balbi To: Borislav Petkov , Felipe Balbi , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: SYSFS "errors" Message-ID: <20130218200424.GA20137@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Reply-To: References: <20130218153316.GA2663@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130218155012.GA30974@kroah.com> <20130218155215.GB2663@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130218171334.GA31329@kroah.com> <20130218172700.GH2663@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130218174527.GB16628@pd.tnic> <20130218184735.GD10755@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <20130218194031.GD16622@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130218194031.GD16622@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:47:35PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:45:27PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:27:00PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > No such device - /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/sdram_scrub_rate > > >=20 > > > Looks like your edac module doesn't allow scrub rate setting. Which e= dac > > > driver is that? dmesg? > >=20 > > $ lsmod | grep -i edac > > i7core_edac 22414 0=20 > > edac_core 43453 2 i7core_edac >=20 > Ok, that would be those i7s which reportedly do > not support reading/setting the scrub rate, see > 27100db0e0d381d24b6f3cb1a4f439996e7c00c8, for example. >=20 > So this is as expected. >=20 > Maybe it would be more correct if the core would return "N/A" or > "unsupported" or something to that effect in such cases, to conform with > the readable flag of the sysfs file. yeah, that would be cool :-) --=20 balbi --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRIolIAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREj0kP/3hFR/URdWEw9WcOFDiNdWIN /5YcbsTYhlIEOw7METYr+zgJ1yrOqbRkgn+yIzxq+notK0iqMoLCfMcN1VApEzH1 c929n2+utyDAHCarmVSAIR3fXA6u/63StLYSB5IOicFIZb4kNp3waL87Z9GzUCCA MtPRAua7EDYxJiAmeMrcrmrKIgt1MuPWttkLn2ZqjO5+oBO5Nw/XAOkHskbFMrjF law0Bwr7uwK8Bt5SPXlr3Ir0BOW15HJoU0suL5R8/Ble1tavYifGBVLGTqC1qR+v yfZHuDko2As97bwjj/pkshZR0g/BLjJhD54dZaJ4RciqwYm9GEyzeUCSBtjwsI8E Kc2a0pXLdtkV6dLHm6JVPJtRl5Gp6UDe80xmN6OfmGZINnUZZltcl07Acp3JQQK8 m6kyba21bfSEy30PYc4feilnx9fk0STE84ZbqmpFp7jYXotBS17yWqH3d7/2jm5j EyWO6C58X1hMOiS7Udz7PsD6ChKcuz5ljsulU3K5nzLgTWH3L8RYpCqtj32yWKef IijZE/7fL896a9NBERBqa6flSg/2rRvvVPFdCW2hLeKigaUSnxlEboaDpzMI098r BgqOPSGBHH3sfTFIbJwWgwajTac8fNyksCwjEOStkjAYd6yjmknSn6GR85lpHuK3 tkTkFoAsZuJT0FkcTzUV =oFXg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--