From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:50:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20130219185034.27993.86892@quantum> References: <1360931849-7090-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5123C6E7.9070407-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Stephen Warren , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad Cc: Russell King , linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Joseph Lo , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-02-19 10:39:35) > On 02/15/2013 05:36 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > This is the seventh version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the > > for-next branch of > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git and > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html. > > Mike, > > I think it'd be prudent to take this series through the Tegra tree again > for 3.10; patch 11 needs to go in as part of the series due to internal > dependencies, and I'm slightly worried that other Tegra DT changes might > conflict with that patch (if only for context). Taking this series (and > any other Tegra clk driver changes for 3.10) through the Tegra tree > could resolve that easily. Do you have a problem with that? > I was thinking the same thing. I'll make time to review these now that 3.8 is out. > If that's OK, can you stage the dependency Peter mentioned: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html > into a stable branch for me to merge, obviously after 3.9-rc1 is out. > I'll take another look at that one. I haven't merged it yet for some reason but I've forgotten why. Assuming nothing is wrong then I'll pull it in towards 3.10. Regards, Mike > Thanks. > > Prashant, could you provide a review/ack for this series too. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933921Ab3BSSuq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]:35073 "EHLO mail-pb0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933907Ab3BSSum convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:50:42 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: Stephen Warren , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad From: Mike Turquette In-Reply-To: <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Russell King , Simon Glass , Joseph Lo , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1360931849-7090-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20130219185034.27993.86892@quantum> User-Agent: alot/0.3.3+ Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:50:34 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-02-19 10:39:35) > On 02/15/2013 05:36 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > This is the seventh version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the > > for-next branch of > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git and > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html. > > Mike, > > I think it'd be prudent to take this series through the Tegra tree again > for 3.10; patch 11 needs to go in as part of the series due to internal > dependencies, and I'm slightly worried that other Tegra DT changes might > conflict with that patch (if only for context). Taking this series (and > any other Tegra clk driver changes for 3.10) through the Tegra tree > could resolve that easily. Do you have a problem with that? > I was thinking the same thing. I'll make time to review these now that 3.8 is out. > If that's OK, can you stage the dependency Peter mentioned: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html > into a stable branch for me to merge, obviously after 3.9-rc1 is out. > I'll take another look at that one. I haven't merged it yet for some reason but I've forgotten why. Assuming nothing is wrong then I'll pull it in towards 3.10. Regards, Mike > Thanks. > > Prashant, could you provide a review/ack for this series too. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:50:34 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework In-Reply-To: <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1360931849-7090-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20130219185034.27993.86892@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-02-19 10:39:35) > On 02/15/2013 05:36 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > This is the seventh version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the > > for-next branch of > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git and > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html. > > Mike, > > I think it'd be prudent to take this series through the Tegra tree again > for 3.10; patch 11 needs to go in as part of the series due to internal > dependencies, and I'm slightly worried that other Tegra DT changes might > conflict with that patch (if only for context). Taking this series (and > any other Tegra clk driver changes for 3.10) through the Tegra tree > could resolve that easily. Do you have a problem with that? > I was thinking the same thing. I'll make time to review these now that 3.8 is out. > If that's OK, can you stage the dependency Peter mentioned: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html > into a stable branch for me to merge, obviously after 3.9-rc1 is out. > I'll take another look at that one. I haven't merged it yet for some reason but I've forgotten why. Assuming nothing is wrong then I'll pull it in towards 3.10. Regards, Mike > Thanks. > > Prashant, could you provide a review/ack for this series too.