Hi, On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:03:54AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2013 07:05 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 06:50:01PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>>>>>>> I wonder if this is because the timeouts get now initialized to 0 instead > >>>>>>>> of -1 for the serial driver? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You meant initialized to -1, right? There's an additional check for timeout being 0. Unless i > >>>>>>> am missing something DT-boot will start off with timeout set to 0 and then get forced to -1. > >>>>> > >>>>> OK > >>>> > >>>> Issue 2: Causing boot to stop when serial driver is initialized. > >>>> (After Issue 1 is fixed) > >>>> > >>>> I could narrow this down to the change done to return -EINVAL > >>>> instead of 0 in serial_omap_get_context_loss_count() as part of > >>>> commit 'a630fbfbb1beeffc5bbe542a7986bf2068874633' "serial: omap: > >>>> Fix device tree based PM runtime" > >>>> > >>>> What this change in turn seems to do is cause a > >>>> serial_omap_restore_context() to get called as part of > >>>> serial_omap_runtime_resume() which was not the case when > >>>> serial_omap_get_context_loss_count() returned 0 > >>>> > >>>> from serial_omap_runtime_resume(): > >>>> ----- > >>>> int loss_cnt = serial_omap_get_context_loss_count(up); > >>>> > >>>> if (loss_cnt < 0) { > >>>> dev_dbg(dev, "serial_omap_get_context_loss_count failed : %d\n", > >>>> loss_cnt); > >>>> serial_omap_restore_context(up); > >>>> } else if (up->context_loss_cnt != loss_cnt) { > >>>> serial_omap_restore_context(up); > >>>> } > >>>> ----- > >>>> > >>>> I am still working on why a serial_omap_restore_context() could > >>>> have caused console to die. I will work with Sourav on this and > >>>> post the fixes for both issue 1 and issue2 once its clear on whats > >>>> really causing issue 2. > >>> > >>> That's because we don't have the omap specific pdata callbacks for > >>> context loss any longer. We may be able to detect when the context > >>> was really lost in the serial driver, and only then call the > >>> serial_omap_restore_context(). > >> > >> Right, but calling serial_omap_restore_context() even when the context > >> is not lost, should not ideally cause an issue. > > > > it does in one condition. If context hasn't been saved before. And that > > can happen in the case of wrong pm runtime status for that device. > > > > Imagine the device is marked as suspended even though it's fully enabled > > (it hasn't been suspended by hwmod due to NO_IDLE flag). In that case > > your context structure is all zeroes (context has never been saved > > before) then when you call pm_runtime_get_sync() on probe() your > > ->runtime_resume() will get called, which will restore context, > > essentially undoing anything which was configured by u-boot. > > This could be a problem for drivers which do a save context in ->runtime_suspend() > but from what I see with omap serial, there is no save context done as part of > ->runtime_suspend. right, because context is "saved" in set_termios. probe() will get called much before set_termios() has a chance to run, right ? Same problem will trigger in that case. I still think patch below is necessary > > (completely untested, didn't even try to compile, just to illustrate) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c > > index 7341eff..d8dca68 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c > > @@ -2559,6 +2559,12 @@ static void __init _setup_postsetup(struct omap_hwmod *oh) > > (postsetup_state == _HWMOD_STATE_IDLE)) { > > oh->_int_flags |= _HWMOD_SKIP_ENABLE; > > postsetup_state = _HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED; > > + > > + /* tell pm_runtime this device is already active */ > > + pm_runtime_set_active(&oh->od->pdev->dev); > > + } else { > > + /* tell pm_runtime this device is trully suspended */ > > + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&oh->od->pdev->dev); > > } > > > > if (postsetup_state == _HWMOD_STATE_IDLE) -- balbi