hi, On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:55:42PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Since commit a630fbf "serial: omap: Fix device tree based PM runtime" > the OMAP serial driver will always try to restore its context in > serial_omap_runtime_resume(). But the problem is that during driver > initialization the UART context is not ready yet and, as result, first > call to pm_runtime_get*() will cause UART register overwriting by all > zeros. This causes Kernel boot hang in case if "earlyprintk" feature is > enabled at least [1]. > > Unfortunately, there is no exact place in driver now where we can > determine that UART context is ready - most of registers configured in > serial_omap_set_termios(), but some of them in other places. > More over, even if PM runtime will be disabled (blocked) during OMAP > serial driver probe() execution [2],[3] it will fix only console UART, > but context of other UARTs will be overwriting by all zeros during first > access to the corresponding UART. > > To fix this issue: > - introduce additional "initialized" flag and update PM runtime callback > to do nothing if its not set. Set "initialized" at the end of probe(). > - read current UART registers configuration in probe and use it by > default. > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg256828.html > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg258062.html > [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg258040.html > > CC: Tony Lindgren > CC: Rajendra Nayak > CC: Felipe Balbi > CC: Kevin Hilman > > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko > --- > tested on OMAP4 SDP with and without earlyprintk enabled. > drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c > index f39bf0c..e1e9667 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c > @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ struct uart_omap_port { > struct work_struct qos_work; > struct pinctrl *pins; > bool is_suspending; > + bool initialized; you really think adding this sort of bool flag is the best thing we can do ? Something which will, quite likely, spread through every single driver ? oh well... -- balbi