All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	jmario@redhat.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip()
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:52:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131024105206.GM2490@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131023204838.GB19466@laptop.lan>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:48:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I'll also make sure to test we actually hit the fault path
> by concurrently running something like:
> 
>  while :; echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ; done
> 
> while doing perf top or so.. 

So the below appears to work; I've ran:

  while :; do echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sleep 1; done &
  while :; do make O=defconfig-build/ clean; perf record -a -g fp -e cycles:pp make O=defconfig-build/ -s -j64; done

And verified that the if (in_nmi()) trace_printk() was visible in the
trace output verifying we indeed took the fault from the NMI code.

I've had this running for ~ 30 minutes or so and the machine is still
healthy.

Don, can you give this stuff a spin on your system?

---
 arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c | 43 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
index 4f74d94c8d97..5465b8613944 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
@@ -11,39 +11,26 @@
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 
 /*
- * best effort, GUP based copy_from_user() that is NMI-safe
+ * We rely on the nested NMI work to allow atomic faults from the NMI path; the
+ * nested NMI paths are careful to preserve CR2.
  */
 unsigned long
 copy_from_user_nmi(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
 {
-	unsigned long offset, addr = (unsigned long)from;
-	unsigned long size, len = 0;
-	struct page *page;
-	void *map;
-	int ret;
+	unsigned long ret;
 
 	if (__range_not_ok(from, n, TASK_SIZE))
-		return len;
-
-	do {
-		ret = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, 0, &page);
-		if (!ret)
-			break;
-
-		offset = addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
-		size = min(PAGE_SIZE - offset, n - len);
-
-		map = kmap_atomic(page);
-		memcpy(to, map+offset, size);
-		kunmap_atomic(map);
-		put_page(page);
-
-		len  += size;
-		to   += size;
-		addr += size;
-
-	} while (len < n);
-
-	return len;
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Even though this function is typically called from NMI/IRQ context
+	 * disable pagefaults so that its behaviour is consistent even when
+	 * called form other contexts.
+	 */
+	pagefault_disable();
+	ret = __copy_from_user_inatomic(to, from, n);
+	pagefault_enable();
+
+	return n - ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_from_user_nmi);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 3aaeffcfd67a..506564b13ba7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ kmmio_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int __kprobes notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
+static inline int __kprobes kprobes_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -1048,7 +1048,7 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
 			return;
 
 		/* kprobes don't want to hook the spurious faults: */
-		if (notify_page_fault(regs))
+		if (kprobes_fault(regs))
 			return;
 		/*
 		 * Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
@@ -1060,23 +1060,8 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
 	}
 
 	/* kprobes don't want to hook the spurious faults: */
-	if (unlikely(notify_page_fault(regs)))
+	if (unlikely(kprobes_fault(regs)))
 		return;
-	/*
-	 * It's safe to allow irq's after cr2 has been saved and the
-	 * vmalloc fault has been handled.
-	 *
-	 * User-mode registers count as a user access even for any
-	 * potential system fault or CPU buglet:
-	 */
-	if (user_mode_vm(regs)) {
-		local_irq_enable();
-		error_code |= PF_USER;
-		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
-	} else {
-		if (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
-			local_irq_enable();
-	}
 
 	if (unlikely(error_code & PF_RSVD))
 		pgtable_bad(regs, error_code, address);
@@ -1088,17 +1073,35 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
 		}
 	}
 
-	perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
-
 	/*
 	 * If we're in an interrupt, have no user context or are running
 	 * in an atomic region then we must not take the fault:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(in_atomic() || !mm)) {
+		if (in_nmi())
+			trace_printk("YIPEE!!!\n");
 		bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address);
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * It's safe to allow irq's after cr2 has been saved and the
+	 * vmalloc fault has been handled.
+	 *
+	 * User-mode registers count as a user access even for any
+	 * potential system fault or CPU buglet:
+	 */
+	if (user_mode_vm(regs)) {
+		local_irq_enable();
+		error_code |= PF_USER;
+		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
+	} else {
+		if (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
+			local_irq_enable();
+	}
+
+	perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
+
 	if (error_code & PF_WRITE)
 		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-24 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-14 20:35 x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-14 21:28 ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-15 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 13:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 14:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 15:41         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 10:57           ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 12:46             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-16 13:31               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 13:54                 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 11:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 13:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-29 14:07                   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Fix NMI measurements tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:52             ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Andi Kleen
2013-10-16 21:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 23:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17  9:41                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:00                     ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:04                       ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 16:30                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 18:26                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-17 21:08                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 21:11                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:01                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 22:27                               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-22 21:12                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23  7:09                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-10-23 20:48                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-24 10:52                                       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-10-24 13:47                                         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-24 14:06                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-25 16:33                                         ` Don Zickus
2013-10-25 17:03                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-26 10:36                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-28 13:19                                             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-29 14:08                                         ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Further optimize copy_from_user_nmi() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-23  7:44                                   ` [PATCH] perf, x86: Optimize intel_pmu_pebs_fixup_ip() Ingo Molnar
2013-10-17 14:49             ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 14:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:03                 ` Don Zickus
2013-10-17 15:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 15:11                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 16:50             ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-15 16:22         ` x86, perf: throttling issues with long nmi latencies Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:36     ` Don Zickus
2013-10-15 14:39       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131024105206.GM2490@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.