From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755647AbaKSKKi (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:10:38 -0500 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:26329 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754007AbaKSKKe (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:10:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:10:03 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: "David S. Miller" , Herbert Xu , Steffen Klassert , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: net: xfrm: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "ipcomp_free_tfms" Message-ID: <20141119101003.GL4905@mwanda> References: <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546BAFF5.5020603@users.sourceforge.net> <20141119084542.GK4905@mwanda> <546C6823.50900@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546C6823.50900@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have come to view you as a very clever troll. You will say infuriating things like "That is an interesting background information but the function implementation update suggestion is correct" and pretend to not see the bug for nine emails. Then you'll say something "Ha ha, I audited all the call trees and it can't actually be NULL so you were getting angry for no reason." Except you'll say it in a more obfuscated way than that. This is what you did last time. regards, dan carpenter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:10:03 +0000 Subject: Re: net: xfrm: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "ipcomp_free_tfms" Message-Id: <20141119101003.GL4905@mwanda> List-Id: References: <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546BAFF5.5020603@users.sourceforge.net> <20141119084542.GK4905@mwanda> <546C6823.50900@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <546C6823.50900@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: "David S. Miller" , Herbert Xu , Steffen Klassert , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall I have come to view you as a very clever troll. You will say infuriating things like "That is an interesting background information but the function implementation update suggestion is correct" and pretend to not see the bug for nine emails. Then you'll say something "Ha ha, I audited all the call trees and it can't actually be NULL so you were getting angry for no reason." Except you'll say it in a more obfuscated way than that. This is what you did last time. regards, dan carpenter