On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > This patch fixes up some whitespace issues and addresses a few > checkpatch warnings. Well, since you asked for it... I am not so strict with the 80 char limit: > @@ -527,8 +528,10 @@ static int i2c_imx_start(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx) > return result; > imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->ifdr, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_IFDR); > /* Enable I2C controller */ > - imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2sr_clr_opcode, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR); > - imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2cr_ien_opcode, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > + imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2sr_clr_opcode, i2c_imx, > + IMX_I2C_I2SR); > + imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2cr_ien_opcode, i2c_imx, > + IMX_I2C_I2CR); Please keep the old way, this is not more readable. > @@ -781,7 +784,8 @@ static int i2c_imx_write(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs) > return 0; > } > > -static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, bool is_lastmsg) > +static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, > + bool is_lastmsg) ditto > @@ -843,8 +848,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, bo > if (i == (msgs->len - 1)) { > if (is_lastmsg) { > /* > - * It must generate STOP before read I2DR to prevent > - * controller from generating another clock cycle > + * It must generate STOP before read I2DR to > + * prevent controller from generating another > + * clock cycle ditto > @@ -855,11 +861,13 @@ static int i2c_imx_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, struct i2c_msg *msgs, bo > i2c_imx->stopped = 1; > } else { > /* > - * For i2c master receiver repeat restart operation like: > + * For i2c master receiver repeat restart > + * operation like: > * read -> repeat MSTA -> read/write > - * The controller must set MTX before read the last byte in > - * the first read operation, otherwise the first read cost > - * one extra clock cycle. > + * The controller must set MTX before read the > + * last byte in the first read operation, > + * otherwise the first read cost one extra clock > + * cycle. ditto > @@ -918,15 +926,16 @@ static int i2c_imx_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, > /* write/read data */ > #ifdef CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS > temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > - dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev, "<%s> CONTROL: IEN=%d, IIEN=%d, " > - "MSTA=%d, MTX=%d, TXAK=%d, RSTA=%d\n", __func__, > + dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev, > + "<%s> CONTROL: IEN=%d, IIEN=%d, MSTA=%d, MTX=%d, TXAK=%d, RSTA=%d\n", > + __func__, This is better than before, good. > (temp & I2CR_IEN ? 1 : 0), (temp & I2CR_IIEN ? 1 : 0), > (temp & I2CR_MSTA ? 1 : 0), (temp & I2CR_MTX ? 1 : 0), > (temp & I2CR_TXAK ? 1 : 0), (temp & I2CR_RSTA ? 1 : 0)); > temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR); > dev_dbg(&i2c_imx->adapter.dev, > - "<%s> STATUS: ICF=%d, IAAS=%d, IBB=%d, " > - "IAL=%d, SRW=%d, IIF=%d, RXAK=%d\n", __func__, > + "<%s> STATUS: ICF=%d, IAAS=%d, IBB=%d, IAL=%d, SRW=%d, IIF=%d, RXAK=%d\n", > + __func__, ditto > @@ -1001,11 +1010,12 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data; > > /* Setup i2c_imx driver structure */ > - strlcpy(i2c_imx->adapter.name, pdev->name, sizeof(i2c_imx->adapter.name)); > + strlcpy(i2c_imx->adapter.name, pdev->name, > + sizeof(i2c_imx->adapter.name)); This not IMO. > @@ -1045,7 +1055,8 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* Set up chip registers to defaults */ > imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2cr_ien_opcode ^ I2CR_IEN, > i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); > - imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2sr_clr_opcode, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR); > + imx_i2c_write_reg(i2c_imx->hwdata->i2sr_clr_opcode, i2c_imx, > + IMX_I2C_I2SR); ditto Rest is appreciated, thanks.