From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757399AbbCMQXd (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:23:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55873 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbbCMQXa (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:23:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:21:13 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Josh Triplett Cc: Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , "Paul E. McKenney" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rik van Riel , Thomas Gleixner , Thiago Macieira , Michael Kerrisk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] clone4: Introduce new CLONE_FD flag to get task exit notification via fd Message-ID: <20150313162113.GA25966@redhat.com> References: <9c39c576e1d9a9912b4aec54d833a73a84d2f592.1426180120.git.josh@joshtriplett.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c39c576e1d9a9912b4aec54d833a73a84d2f592.1426180120.git.josh@joshtriplett.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Josh, I'll certainly try to read this series, but not before next week. but a couple of nits right now. On 03/12, Josh Triplett wrote: > > When passed CLONE_FD, clone4 will return a file descriptor rather than a > PID. When the child process exits, it gets automatically reaped, And even I have no idea what you are actually doing, this doesn't look right, see below. > +static unsigned int clonefd_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) > +{ > + struct task_struct *p = file->private_data; > + poll_wait(file, &p->clonefd_wqh, wait); > + return p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD ? (POLLIN | POLLRDNORM) : 0; > +} > + > +static ssize_t clonefd_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) > +{ > + struct task_struct *p = file->private_data; > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* EOF after first read */ > + if (*ppos) > + return 0; > + > + if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) > + ret = -EAGAIN; > + else > + ret = wait_event_interruptible(p->clonefd_wqh, p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD); > + > + if (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD) { Again, I simply do not know what this code does at all. But I bet the usage of EXIT_DEAD is wrong ;) OK, OK, I can be wrong. But I simply do not see what protects this task_struct if it is EXIT_DEAD (in fact even if it is EXIT_ZOMBIE). > @@ -598,7 +600,9 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_struct *tsk, int group_dead) > if (group_dead) > kill_orphaned_pgrp(tsk->group_leader, NULL); > > - if (unlikely(tsk->ptrace)) { > + if (tsk->autoreap) { > + autoreap = true; Debuggers won't be happy. A ptraced task should not autoreap itself. Oleg.