From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932898AbbELNcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 09:32:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:36831 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932579AbbELNcJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 09:32:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:32:04 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: YH Huang Cc: Matthias Brugger , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: add Mediatek display PWM driver support Message-ID: <20150512133202.GA24684@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1431336382-13167-1-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> <1431336382-13167-3-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1431336382-13167-3-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:26:22PM +0800, YH Huang wrote: > Add display PWM driver support to modify backlight for MT8173/MT6595. >=20 > Signed-off-by: YH Huang > --- > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ++ > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++ > 3 files changed, 235 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > index b1541f4..9edbb5a 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > @@ -111,6 +111,15 @@ config PWM_CLPS711X > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module > will be called pwm-clps711x. > =20 > +config PWM_DISP_MEDIATEK Please make this "PWM_MEDIATEK_DISP" so we can keep everything sorted by vendor. > + tristate "MEDIATEK display PWM driver" "MediaTek"? > + depends on OF Technically I think you need depends on HAS_IOMEM here to avoid breakage on randconfig builds. > + help > + Generic PWM framework driver for mediatek disp-pwm device. "MediaTek"? Also perhaps this should describe what this PWM is instead of just the "disp-pwm" which leaves everyone guessing what it is. From the name I'd expect it to be the PWM that is used to control the backlight brightness for display, but I think this description should say that explicitly. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module > + will be called pwm-disp-mediatek. pwm-mediatek-disp > + > config PWM_EP93XX > tristate "Cirrus Logic EP93xx PWM support" > depends on ARCH_EP93XX > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile > index ec50eb5..c5ff72a 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_BCM_KONA) +=3D pwm-bcm-kona.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_BCM2835) +=3D pwm-bcm2835.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_BFIN) +=3D pwm-bfin.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLPS711X) +=3D pwm-clps711x.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DISP_MEDIATEK) +=3D pwm-disp-mediatek.o Also name this "pwm-mediatek-disp.o" to reflect the Kconfig name. > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_EP93XX) +=3D pwm-ep93xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_FSL_FTM) +=3D pwm-fsl-ftm.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMG) +=3D pwm-img.o > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-media= tek.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..38293af > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c > @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ > +/* > + * Mediatek display pulse-width-modulation controller driver. > + * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc. > + * Author: YH Huang > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#define DISP_PWM_EN_OFF (0x0) The _OFF suffix here is unfortunate because I'm reading this as being the "OFF" value for a field named "DISP_PWM_EN". I think it'd be better to name this one DISP_PWM_EN. The same goes for any of the following registers. Also, drop the parentheses if the expression is simple. > +#define PWM_ENABLE_SHIFT (0x0) > +#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK (0x1 << PWM_ENABLE_SHIFT) > + > +#define DISP_PWM_COMMIT_OFF (0x08) > +#define PWM_COMMIT_SHIFT (0x0) > +#define PWM_COMMIT_MASK (0x1 << PWM_COMMIT_SHIFT) > + > +#define DISP_PWM_CON_0_OFF (0x10) > +#define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT (0x10) > +#define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (0x3ff << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT) > +#define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX (0x000003ff) > + > +#define DISP_PWM_CON_1_OFF (0x14) > +#define PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT (0x0) > +#define PWM_PERIOD_MASK (0xfff << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT) > +#define PWM_PERIOD_MAX (0x00000fff) > +/* Shift log2(PWM_PERIOD_MAX + 1) as divisor */ > +#define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT 12 This is confusing, see below. > + > +#define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT (0x10) > +#define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT) > + > +#define NUM_PWM 1 You can drop this, it's only used once. > + > +struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip { > + struct pwm_chip chip; > + struct device *dev; > + struct clk *clk_main; > + struct clk *clk_mm; > + void __iomem *mmio_base; > +}; Please don't add this artificial padding, a single space is enough as a separator. Also, I think you can drop the _chip suffix on the structure name. > + > +static void mtk_disp_pwm_setting(void __iomem *address, u32 value, u32 m= ask) This is a bad name. I think you should adopt the naming of regmap, which this effectively copies, so this should be: static void mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(void __iomem *address, u32 mask, u32 = value) > +static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device = *pwm, > + int duty_ns, int period_ns) > +{ > + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *mpc; > + u64 div, rate; > + u32 clk_div, period, high_width, rem; > + > + /* > + * Find period, high_width and clk_div to suit duty_ns and period_ns. > + * Calculate proper div value to keep period value in the bound. > + * > + * period_ns =3D 10^9 * (clk_div + 1) * (period +1) / PWM_CLK_RATE > + * duty_ns =3D 10^9 * (clk_div + 1) * (high_width + 1) / PWM_CLK_RATE > + * > + * period =3D (PWM_CLK_RATE * period_ns) / (10^9 * (clk_div + 1)) - 1 > + * high_width =3D (PWM_CLK_RATE * duty_ns) / (10^9 * (clk_div + 1)) - 1 > + */ > + mpc =3D container_of(chip, struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip, chip); Can you add a static inline function to wrap the container_of() invocation? You need to do this quite often and the wrapper will shorten the code significantly: static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip) { return container_of(chip, struct mtk_disp_pwm, chip); } Also it's slightly more canonical to initialize the mpc variable as part of the declaration. > + rate =3D clk_get_rate(mpc->clk_main); > + clk_div =3D div_u64_rem(rate * period_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC, &rem) >> > + PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT; > + if (clk_div > PWM_CLKDIV_MAX) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + div =3D clk_div + 1; > + period =3D div64_u64(rate * period_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC * div); > + if (period > 0) > + period--; > + high_width =3D div64_u64(rate * duty_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC * div); > + if (high_width > 0) > + high_width--; > + > + mtk_disp_pwm_setting(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_0_OFF, > + clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK); > + mtk_disp_pwm_setting(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_1_OFF, > + (period << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT) | > + (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT), > + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK); Can you align these differently to make it more readable? mtk_display_pwm_update_bits(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_1, PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, (period << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT) | (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)); Or perhaps split it into multiple steps to make it even more readable: value =3D (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (period << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT); mtk_display_pwm_update_bits(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_1, PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK | PWM_PERIOD_MASK, value); > +static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *pwm; > + struct resource *r; > + int ret; > + > + pwm =3D devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pwm) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pwm->dev =3D &pdev->dev; > + > + r =3D platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + pwm->mmio_base =3D devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r); > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->mmio_base)) > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->mmio_base); > + > + pwm->clk_main =3D devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "main"); > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk_main)) > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk_main); > + pwm->clk_mm =3D devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mm"); I think it's more readable if a blank line separates the above two lines. > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk_mm)) > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk_mm); > + > + ret =3D clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk_main); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + ret =3D clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk_mm); Same here. > + if (ret < 0) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk_main); > + return ret; > + } > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm); > + > + pwm->chip.dev =3D &pdev->dev; > + pwm->chip.ops =3D &mtk_disp_pwm_ops; > + pwm->chip.base =3D -1; > + pwm->chip.npwm =3D NUM_PWM; > + > + ret =3D pwmchip_add(&pwm->chip); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret); Shouldn't you disable the clocks here? > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *pc =3D platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + if (WARN_ON(!pc)) > + return -ENODEV; You can drop this. Better to let it crash so that you have to fix it if you ever encounter it. > + > + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk_main); > + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk_mm); > + > + return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip); > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] =3D { > + { .compatible =3D "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" }, > + { } > +}; > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match); No blank line between the above two lines. > + > +static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver =3D { > + .driver =3D { > + .name =3D "mediatek-disp-pwm", > + .owner =3D THIS_MODULE, > + .of_match_table =3D mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, > + }, > + .probe =3D mtk_disp_pwm_probe, > + .remove =3D mtk_disp_pwm_remove, > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver(mtk_disp_pwm_driver); Same here. Also, no need to initialize .driver.owner, module_platform_driver() does that for you. Thierry --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJVUgDPAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhqg8P/2aaxdxkTpY19GRr+f2ojRx4 ccdJPaakxme9UJx7394zuLl4ehcXU1V8a8ktUPJ5QSiasH8He06mPferOPZbbECw HgrD9hUJDkHC9JswzxNF/xiya2rSH+lG3UHsPy42ALNNkWIgRNqgepvZ2gGTH2Lm 4ovUHrYZkbgN901pqhGTns5aDT/IrZ4BYNk+CrAP/LEJgDO183yg9OdjK3K+1s+w gIljDBD6so85O5DbIWTEh+KP4PMmRSHUisuRg/9oZD0pVD899gMHWjlgD+uC5OLT ktjpQzD5vQpThc7CAM3J73K2T/6Flk1b8wetImkS41ygyFKs4i6wq9Wmyybab/Uq +fwKn9dj2XsCR3VjWxPvMcNsEUlGfp03zwD3op3RL8jGPHcQNJn4SbCKQtgAdO7e lku7u3Wk8F/Mg2PqNwoCKfKN/jdiScuToVUBKiNbOzoFWd4QQmbDM4nPNOS4CrYa kU6lLQbJh7IPBTbBaDL84jkF/U0zkh3JQU1wzut/nur4kK1P+Ohl71NDw9kGrGWi sxQ1DVWDgbjHN/ZXVQVmjKP08F8cOeCs2fFOCiilXGZBiF6o+5b/7WiiyXXcmgbz lc1403JEnkNw1ii4Rx7je0847fxK9zin4nCPY0h2jSJgbNiIU1qA4qJhnCcYYlhw fWYa5/dRPIm06Rjo8PIi =/3uf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:32:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: add Mediatek display PWM driver support In-Reply-To: <1431336382-13167-3-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> References: <1431336382-13167-1-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> <1431336382-13167-3-git-send-email-yh.huang@mediatek.com> Message-ID: <20150512133202.GA24684@ulmo.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:26:22PM +0800, YH Huang wrote: > Add display PWM driver support to modify backlight for MT8173/MT6595. > > Signed-off-by: YH Huang > --- > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ++ > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 235 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > index b1541f4..9edbb5a 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > @@ -111,6 +111,15 @@ config PWM_CLPS711X > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module > will be called pwm-clps711x. > > +config PWM_DISP_MEDIATEK Please make this "PWM_MEDIATEK_DISP" so we can keep everything sorted by vendor. > + tristate "MEDIATEK display PWM driver" "MediaTek"? > + depends on OF Technically I think you need depends on HAS_IOMEM here to avoid breakage on randconfig builds. > + help > + Generic PWM framework driver for mediatek disp-pwm device. "MediaTek"? Also perhaps this should describe what this PWM is instead of just the "disp-pwm" which leaves everyone guessing what it is. From the name I'd expect it to be the PWM that is used to control the backlight brightness for display, but I think this description should say that explicitly. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module > + will be called pwm-disp-mediatek. pwm-mediatek-disp > + > config PWM_EP93XX > tristate "Cirrus Logic EP93xx PWM support" > depends on ARCH_EP93XX > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile > index ec50eb5..c5ff72a 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_BCM_KONA) += pwm-bcm-kona.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_BCM2835) += pwm-bcm2835.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_BFIN) += pwm-bfin.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLPS711X) += pwm-clps711x.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DISP_MEDIATEK) += pwm-disp-mediatek.o Also name this "pwm-mediatek-disp.o" to reflect the Kconfig name. > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_EP93XX) += pwm-ep93xx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_FSL_FTM) += pwm-fsl-ftm.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_IMG) += pwm-img.o > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..38293af > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-disp-mediatek.c > @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ > +/* > + * Mediatek display pulse-width-modulation controller driver. > + * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc. > + * Author: YH Huang > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#define DISP_PWM_EN_OFF (0x0) The _OFF suffix here is unfortunate because I'm reading this as being the "OFF" value for a field named "DISP_PWM_EN". I think it'd be better to name this one DISP_PWM_EN. The same goes for any of the following registers. Also, drop the parentheses if the expression is simple. > +#define PWM_ENABLE_SHIFT (0x0) > +#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK (0x1 << PWM_ENABLE_SHIFT) > + > +#define DISP_PWM_COMMIT_OFF (0x08) > +#define PWM_COMMIT_SHIFT (0x0) > +#define PWM_COMMIT_MASK (0x1 << PWM_COMMIT_SHIFT) > + > +#define DISP_PWM_CON_0_OFF (0x10) > +#define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT (0x10) > +#define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (0x3ff << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT) > +#define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX (0x000003ff) > + > +#define DISP_PWM_CON_1_OFF (0x14) > +#define PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT (0x0) > +#define PWM_PERIOD_MASK (0xfff << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT) > +#define PWM_PERIOD_MAX (0x00000fff) > +/* Shift log2(PWM_PERIOD_MAX + 1) as divisor */ > +#define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT 12 This is confusing, see below. > + > +#define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT (0x10) > +#define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT) > + > +#define NUM_PWM 1 You can drop this, it's only used once. > + > +struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip { > + struct pwm_chip chip; > + struct device *dev; > + struct clk *clk_main; > + struct clk *clk_mm; > + void __iomem *mmio_base; > +}; Please don't add this artificial padding, a single space is enough as a separator. Also, I think you can drop the _chip suffix on the structure name. > + > +static void mtk_disp_pwm_setting(void __iomem *address, u32 value, u32 mask) This is a bad name. I think you should adopt the naming of regmap, which this effectively copies, so this should be: static void mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(void __iomem *address, u32 mask, u32 value) > +static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > + int duty_ns, int period_ns) > +{ > + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *mpc; > + u64 div, rate; > + u32 clk_div, period, high_width, rem; > + > + /* > + * Find period, high_width and clk_div to suit duty_ns and period_ns. > + * Calculate proper div value to keep period value in the bound. > + * > + * period_ns = 10^9 * (clk_div + 1) * (period +1) / PWM_CLK_RATE > + * duty_ns = 10^9 * (clk_div + 1) * (high_width + 1) / PWM_CLK_RATE > + * > + * period = (PWM_CLK_RATE * period_ns) / (10^9 * (clk_div + 1)) - 1 > + * high_width = (PWM_CLK_RATE * duty_ns) / (10^9 * (clk_div + 1)) - 1 > + */ > + mpc = container_of(chip, struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip, chip); Can you add a static inline function to wrap the container_of() invocation? You need to do this quite often and the wrapper will shorten the code significantly: static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip) { return container_of(chip, struct mtk_disp_pwm, chip); } Also it's slightly more canonical to initialize the mpc variable as part of the declaration. > + rate = clk_get_rate(mpc->clk_main); > + clk_div = div_u64_rem(rate * period_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC, &rem) >> > + PWM_PERIOD_BIT_SHIFT; > + if (clk_div > PWM_CLKDIV_MAX) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + div = clk_div + 1; > + period = div64_u64(rate * period_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC * div); > + if (period > 0) > + period--; > + high_width = div64_u64(rate * duty_ns, NSEC_PER_SEC * div); > + if (high_width > 0) > + high_width--; > + > + mtk_disp_pwm_setting(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_0_OFF, > + clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK); > + mtk_disp_pwm_setting(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_1_OFF, > + (period << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT) | > + (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT), > + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK); Can you align these differently to make it more readable? mtk_display_pwm_update_bits(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_1, PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, (period << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT) | (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)); Or perhaps split it into multiple steps to make it even more readable: value = (high_width << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (period << PWM_PERIOD_SHIFT); mtk_display_pwm_update_bits(mpc->mmio_base + DISP_PWM_CON_1, PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK | PWM_PERIOD_MASK, value); > +static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *pwm; > + struct resource *r; > + int ret; > + > + pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pwm) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + pwm->dev = &pdev->dev; > + > + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + pwm->mmio_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r); > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->mmio_base)) > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->mmio_base); > + > + pwm->clk_main = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "main"); > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk_main)) > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk_main); > + pwm->clk_mm = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mm"); I think it's more readable if a blank line separates the above two lines. > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk_mm)) > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk_mm); > + > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk_main); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk_mm); Same here. > + if (ret < 0) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk_main); > + return ret; > + } > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm); > + > + pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev; > + pwm->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops; > + pwm->chip.base = -1; > + pwm->chip.npwm = NUM_PWM; > + > + ret = pwmchip_add(&pwm->chip); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret); Shouldn't you disable the clocks here? > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct mtk_disp_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + if (WARN_ON(!pc)) > + return -ENODEV; You can drop this. Better to let it crash so that you have to fix it if you ever encounter it. > + > + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk_main); > + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk_mm); > + > + return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip); > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" }, > + { } > +}; > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match); No blank line between the above two lines. > + > +static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm", > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + .of_match_table = mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, > + }, > + .probe = mtk_disp_pwm_probe, > + .remove = mtk_disp_pwm_remove, > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver(mtk_disp_pwm_driver); Same here. Also, no need to initialize .driver.owner, module_platform_driver() does that for you. Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: