From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59632)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dgilbert@redhat.com>) id 1YsvDu-0006xQ-3f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:38:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dgilbert@redhat.com>) id 1YsvDt-00076m-B6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:38:58 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:38:43 +0100
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150514153843.GH2576@work-vm>
References: <1431076567-30371-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<1431076567-30371-2-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20150514111937.GD2576@work-vm> <5554AA91.2000601@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5554AA91.2000601@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH COLO v4 01/15] docs: block replication's
 description
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Wen Congyang <ghostwcy@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, qemu block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>, Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>, qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>, zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>

* Wen Congyang (ghostwcy@gmail.com) wrote:
> At 2015/5/14 19:19, Dr. David Alan Gilbert Wrote:
> >One thing I wanted to check I understand;  how much RAM do the active and hidden
> >disks use;  lets say during the 1st checkpoint   10MB of disk is written,
> >and during hte 2nd checkpoint a different 10MB of the disk is written
> >(to different locations on the disk); how big are the active and hidden
> >disks in RAM - are they 10MB or 20MB?
> 
> 10MB, we will make active and hidden disks empty when doing checkpoint.

Thanks, that's what I was hoping.

Dave

> 
> Thanks
> Wen Congyang
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK