From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: rdma kernel tree Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:18:42 -0600 Message-ID: <20150519191842.GQ18675@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373A8FD8CF5@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <1431485563.43876.93.camel@redhat.com> <1431530845.2377.30.camel@redhat.com> <5554B7E8.4020902@mellanox.com> <1431615776.3276.14.camel@redhat.com> <555ABD9D.3080303@mellanox.com> <1432038160.3114.16.camel@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma (linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:47:06PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Doug, I have never ever seen a patch set (specifically the 15~23 part > of it) with that level of simplicity and > signature/reviewers/tested-by/etc inflation. It's just eye burner. > Maybe that long list is OK for patch #1 but very much not to these > bunch of 1-2 liner downstream patches. The work was done, credit is due. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html