All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Avoid writing relocs with addresses in non-canonical form
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:39:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151204153930.GO27216@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449242443-32493-1-git-send-email-michal.winiarski@intel.com>

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:20:43PM +0100, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> According to bspec, some parts of HW expect the addresses to be in
> a canonical form, where bits [63:48] == [47]. Let's convert addresses to
> canonical form prior to relocating and return converted offsets to
> userspace.
> 
> v2: Whitespace fixup, gen8_canonical_addr description (Chris, Ville)
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>

There is a hole! Inside the actual relocation fixup you need

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index a4c243cec4aa..6d1a2d20337b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -249,6 +249,12 @@ static inline int use_cpu_reloc(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
                obj->cache_level != I915_CACHE_NONE);
 }
 
+static uint64_t relocation_target(struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *reloc,
+                                 uint64_t target_offset)
+{
+       return gen8_cannonical_address((int)reloc->delta + target_offset);
+}
+
 static int
 relocate_entry_cpu(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
                   struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *reloc,
@@ -256,7 +262,7 @@ relocate_entry_cpu(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 {
        struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
        uint32_t page_offset = offset_in_page(reloc->offset);
-       uint64_t delta = reloc->delta + target_offset;
+       uint64_t delta = relocation_target(reloc, target_get);
        char *vaddr;
        int ret;
 
@@ -292,7 +298,7 @@ relocate_entry_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 {
        struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
-       uint64_t delta = reloc->delta + target_offset;
+       uint64_t delta = relocation_target(reloc, target_get);
        uint64_t offset;
        void __iomem *reloc_page;
        int ret;
@@ -347,7 +353,7 @@ relocate_entry_clflush(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 {
        struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
        uint32_t page_offset = offset_in_page(reloc->offset);
-       uint64_t delta = (int)reloc->delta + target_offset;
+       uint64_t delta = relocation_target(reloc, target_get);
        char *vaddr;
        int ret;
 
Otherwise we may cross the 1<<47 boundary without swapping into cannonical
form.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-04 11:33 [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid writing relocs with addresses in non-canonical form Michał Winiarski
2015-12-04 11:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-04 12:05 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-04 15:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-04 15:39   ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2015-12-04 16:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-04 17:41     ` Winiarski, Michal
2015-12-07  8:31       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-10 12:50   ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-11 14:13   ` [PATCH v3] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-11 14:43     ` Michel Thierry
2015-12-18 16:31     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-18 20:01     ` [PATCH v4] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-18 20:26       ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-22 11:00       ` [PATCH v5] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-22 11:41         ` Winiarski, Michal
2015-12-22 12:37         ` [PATCH v6] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-22 15:00           ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-29 15:49           ` [PATCH v7] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-29 16:25             ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-29 17:14             ` [PATCH v8] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-29 17:24               ` [PATCH v9] " Michał Winiarski
2015-12-29 17:28                 ` Chris Wilson
2016-01-05 10:01                   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-29 17:25               ` [PATCH v8] " Chris Wilson
2015-12-19  8:20 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2015-12-22 11:13 ` Patchwork
2015-12-22 14:49 ` Patchwork
2015-12-29 16:20 ` ✗ failure: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2015-12-29 17:49 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151204153930.GO27216@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.